← All episodes
S1E19

Turning Industrial Waste into Carbon Storage | Scaling Climate Tech in Austria | S1E19

with Lucas Huba· Sequestra· 75m

TL;DR

Sequestra uses AI-driven mineralization to store CO2 in industrial waste, creating construction materials and addressing hard-to-abate emissions.

Synopsis
Lucas Huba, founder of Sequestra, discusses their technology for mineralizing CO2 into industrial waste materials like steel slag and mining tailings. This process permanently stores carbon, transforming waste into valuable construction aggregates. The company aims to provide carbonation intelligence and industrial-scale reactors to heavy industries. The business model is driven by the EU's delegated act, which recognizes CO2 stored in building materials as permanent utilization, exempting companies from emission fines. Sequestra focuses on hard-to-abate sectors like cement and waste incineration, offering a solution for their unavoidable process emissions and creating a new revenue stream from waste valorization.

Key metrics

by the numbers · 8
  • 13 billion tons
    Chile copper tailings
  • 10%
    Global emissions reduction potential
  • 20%
    CO2 uptake potential of steel slag
  • €1 billion
    Carbon capture plant cost
  • 90%
    Carbon capture for enhanced oil recovery
  • €140 per ton
    EU ETS fine for cement
  • 7%
    Steel sector global CO2 emissions
  • 20
    Mineralization startups in Europe

Topics

8 tags
Industrial DecarbonizationCarbon Capture Utilization (CCU)MineralizationWaste ValorizationMetallurgyClimate Tech EcosystemStartup FundingPolicy Incentives
Stats
Duration
1h 15m
Words
12.7k
Questions
41

Timeline

11 chapters
  1. Guest Introduction

    Lucas Huba, a metallurgist and entrepreneur, is introduced as the founder of Sequestra, focusing on CO2 and industrial waste.

  2. Educational Background

    Lucas shares his journey into metallurgical engineering in Leoben, Austria, and his growing interest in heavy industrial sustainability and recycling technologies.

  3. Entrepreneurial Roots

    Lucas discusses his innate entrepreneurial drive, which led him to found two NGOs, 'Engineers for a Sustainable Future' and 'Shift Tanks', during his PhD to engage engineers in sustainability.

  4. Sequestra's Genesis

    Lucas identified a critical gap in green heavy industrial production, leading him to explore valorizing industrial waste materials by storing CO2 within them, which became the foundation for Sequestra.

  5. Core Technology

    Sequestra's technology focuses on the mineralization of CO2 into industrial waste materials like steel slag, transforming them into valuable construction aggregates.

  6. Policy Tailwinds

    A new EU delegated act defines CO2 used in the building sector as permanent utilization, providing a significant economic incentive for Sequestra's technology by avoiding emission fines.

  7. Sequestra's Approach

    Sequestra employs a wet process direct carbonation technique, mixing waste materials with water and injecting CO2, coupled with an AI-driven rapid empirical testing system for carbonation intelligence.

  8. Business Case

    The business model leverages the high EU ETS fines (e.g., €140/ton for cement) by offering a cost-effective solution for CO2 storage in building materials, creating a new revenue stream for industrial waste producers.

  9. Austrian Climate Tech

    Lucas highlights the challenges for industrial climate tech hardware startups in Austria, noting a lack of ecosystem support, specialized workshops, and fellow founders despite good grant funding.

  10. Scaling Challenges

    Scaling a high-tech startup in Austria and Europe presents challenges in securing large amounts of capital beyond national grants, though new EU investment initiatives offer potential solutions.

  11. Future Vision

    By 2030, Sequestra aims to be the global leader in carbonation intelligence, with automated labs and industrial plants, focusing on developing technologies that directly reduce emissions.

Key insights

5 takeaways
  • 01

    EU Policy Drives CCU Value

    A recent EU delegated act redefines CO2 utilization, recognizing only building material storage as permanent. This creates a strong economic incentive for mineralization over other carbon capture and utilization pathways.

  • 02

    Hard-to-Abate Sector Challenge

    Industries like cement, waste incineration, and refractory production face unavoidable process emissions. Carbon capture and utilization technologies are essential for their long-term viability under tightening regulations.

  • 03

    Industrial Waste as Carbon Sink

    Mineral waste materials such as steel slag, mining tailings, and building rubble possess significant capacity to chemically bind CO2. This offers a scalable solution for permanent carbon storage and valorization into construction products.

  • 04

    Data-Driven Carbonation Optimization

    Sequestra's unique approach uses automated rapid empirical testing and big data to optimize carbonation processes for diverse waste materials. The goal is to become a global leader in carbonation intelligence.

  • 05

    Austrian Climate Tech Ecosystem Gaps

    Despite good grant funding, Austria lacks a robust ecosystem for industrial climate tech hardware startups. Challenges include finding co-founders, specialized workshops, and late-stage capital compared to software ventures.

Pull quotes

4 quotes
  • Every molecule of CO2 that's used in the building sector is utilization and everything else is an emission. This is our biggest tailwind at Sequestra right now
    Lucas Huba
  • We are a hybrid between big data and yeah, heavy industrial green tech and big data and AI is a big word.
    Lucas Huba
  • If you want to get free money as a startup owner, you should come to Austria. There's a lot of grant money, but we have no infrastructure for if you if you try to build a chemical reactor.
    Lucas Huba
  • Intentions don't matter actions do. like talking about stuff a lot of people like to talk about what they would do.
    Lucas Huba
Transcript1972 cuesClick a timestamp to jump
  1. Welcome to a new episode of the Energy
  2. Bridge., today we have the pleasure
  3. to have Lucas Huba, if I pronounce it
  4. well.
  5. >> Yeah, that's fine.
  6. >> Yeah. well since I'm from Chile from
  7. a mining country I'm very excited to
  8. this interview because you are a
  9. metallergic expert
  10. an entrepreneur
  11. and working with CO2 so it's a lot of
  12. topics together very interesting so
  13. thank you for being here with us
  14. >> thank you very much yes
  15. >> thank you very much Lucas you're one of
  16. the coolest researcher I already told
  17. you I'm not a researcher anymore or
  18. >> but having said that yeah you have a way
  19. like you have done so much man I have
  20. three pages of what you have done
  21. already how old are you
  22. >> I will turn 32 soon
  23. >> yeah maybe we could start with your
  24. educational journey and you were telling
  25. us u behind camera that Austria is
  26. you only have a small mining So how do
  27. you how did you get this methological
  28. passion?
  29. >> Yeah, passion. So I grew up in a small
  30. town. It's close to Leon where I
  31. studied. Leon has or still has but back
  32. then it has a very very high reputation
  33. in terms of engineering. So it was
  34. always considered very good technical
  35. university and still is.
  36. >>. just in the last years got a big
  37. down because the urge to study something
  38. in engineering got much less in Austria.
  39. Less and less people are studying
  40. engineering and so although it hit hard
  41. on Leo every first year at this
  42. university is the same for every major
  43. and then they make this presentations of
  44. the different studies and they present
  45. themselves to all the students. It just
  46. looked very interesting, like
  47. metalology is very big, very hot.
  48. Everything is super heavy in a steel
  49. plant. Everything can, just
  50. that the crane that picks up steel pls
  51. has five tons just at the very top of
  52. the crane. Everything is massive. I just
  53. liked it. And it back then I also was
  54. interested in earning money. I would
  55. say I have to say back then I was like I
  56. want to have a job where I can earn have
  57. a nice career as an engineer and
  58. methology for sure is a field where you
  59. can do that. So then I started after
  60. one year I switched and started
  61. methological engineering and then I just
  62. stick to it and I always liked it. I
  63. have to say it's very niche..
  64. >> I've never in my whole life met anyone
  65. outside of a professional context that
  66. also studied meloical engineering at
  67. conferences. Yes, of course. But no, not
  68. that a single party never I met anyone
  69. who was like I also studied methological
  70. engineering
  71. >> in India when you do when you go for
  72. engineering.
  73. >> Yeah.
  74. >> So if you have a high rank you go for
  75. computer science. Yeah. If you have
  76. slightly lower rank, you go for
  77. electronics and communication
  78. >> then then a bit more then maybe
  79. mechanical and if you have the last rank
  80. >> then or no
  81. mining or metallergy or something but I
  82. mean it's getting more and more
  83. important now like when but I'm talking
  84. about way back like a decade back.
  85. >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. In Austria has a very
  86. strong methological industry.
  87. >> Yeah. there's this process if
  88. you produce steel you take iron or take
  89. out the carbon then you have enriched
  90. hot metal with enriched carbon content
  91. and you need to take out the carbon and
  92. this process you blow in oxygen this
  93. process is called basic oxygen furnace
  94. or LD process it's the most famous
  95. industrial process in the world and
  96. around 75% of all steel produced by this
  97. process it was developed in Austria
  98. called LD is lint stonovitz process so
  99. we have a very strong methological
  100. background
  101. >> and I just yeah I liked it and I stick
  102. to it and that's how it
  103. >> you did all your studies in Luben.
  104. >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I Yeah. Everything I
  105. was I told you I was in India for two
  106. months as an internship and then I
  107. wanted during my PhD I wanted to go
  108. abroad but then corona hit so I
  109. >> I was eight years in Le. Yeah.
  110. >> Yeah. And in the middle of your studies
  111. you went into recycling technologies.
  112. How was the motivation and what do you
  113. do?
  114. >> I have to say heavy industries,
  115. everything in heavy industries moved
  116. into sustainability., it's all
  117. >> energy optimization, less resources,
  118. recycling. So
  119. >> when I looked at potential master thesis
  120. topics,
  121. >> it's all recycling optimization. So I
  122. just started a master thesis in
  123. recycling engineering, recycling some
  124. slack. Slag is a byproduct in every
  125. pyromethological process. So every
  126. mineral material that was that was
  127. liquid at some time is a
  128. >> slag.
  129. >> So I started in this field then I
  130. liked it pretty much. this whole
  131. heavy industrial sustainability topic.
  132. It just seemed very interesting and
  133. challenging to me and it is very
  134. challenging. We can talk about it later
  135. for a long time. it is never ending and
  136. very challenging and this is how I got
  137. into this field actually also when I was
  138. in India it's also did something to
  139. me to see the environmental problems you
  140. know of like Mumbai
  141. and I was just like
  142. >> what can you do work right like going to
  143. India and it changed your life
  144. >> it changed my life yes in some way for
  145. Sure. Yeah. Yeah. Now I came back then I
  146. graduated.
  147. >> Okay.
  148. >> Then I did
  149. 7 months of traveling.
  150. >>.
  151. >> And then I went to India again in this
  152. traveling period and then traveled the
  153. whole country and also other countries
  154. in Southeast Asia and I was like yeah
  155. >> you need to do something. I'm
  156. a big Africa fan also. I've been many
  157. times in Africa and it's the same thing
  158. in Africa. Who is developing a recycling
  159. process? if you are in a country that
  160. has much bigger urgent problems you
  161. know.
  162. >> Yeah. Yeah. So I was like I always
  163. was like we should develop technologies
  164. for the world in a country we can do it.
  165. This is why I then stuck to recycling
  166. engineering and did my my PhD in this
  167. field and I always liked it. I really
  168. have to say it was a good
  169. >> profession to choose.
  170. >> But it's also a thing like
  171. every everything that got manufactured
  172. >> the let's the in poorer Asian countries
  173. in African they got stuck with it like
  174. plastic is a big problem in India and
  175. also in Africa.
  176. >> Yeah
  177. >> 100 years ago everything was sustainable
  178. for them. They would use plantbased
  179. plates.
  180. >> Yeah.
  181. >> Or steel plates. Then they plastic
  182. got introduced I guess 30 years ago or
  183. something and now they filth everywhere.
  184. >> It's crazy. Yeah, it's get gets ever
  185. more crazy. No. So this was the how I
  186. maneuvered into this field.
  187. >> Did it also inspire you to take on
  188. entrepreneurship?
  189. >> I think I always had this
  190. entrepreneurial thing in me. I just for
  191. a long time didn't do much about it.
  192. >>. But looking back, I've always been
  193. like this. I just I think my studies
  194. were too consuming.
  195. >>.
  196. >> So that was not really a possibility. I
  197. studied like crazy. I wanted to get done
  198. with studying and there was not much to
  199. do around that. But then I started
  200. working in my PhD.
  201. >>.
  202. >> And I worked and after 40 hours everyone
  203. went home, . And I was like I
  204. was always and also still today I have
  205. >> I don't know but I have too much energy
  206. like I have just it can be
  207. annoying also to other people I just
  208. said I can't go home after 40 hours I
  209. don't know what to do then I
  210. can I do a lot of sports and stuff like
  211. this but
  212. >> also back then everyone went home at
  213. 3:00 and I was like I can't do this I
  214. can't do this for three years I
  215. will go crazy and then I founded these
  216. two NOS's and it really gave me a lot
  217. purpose was also like building something
  218. entrepreneurial on a volunteerial basis.
  219. >>.
  220. >> But I worked 40 hours a week and then
  221. put in another 2530 into those building
  222. those two organizations. And
  223. >> what are they about?
  224. >> So the first one doesn't exist
  225. anymore. It was called Engineers for a
  226. Sustainable Future. I wanted to
  227. seeing all this crazy environmental
  228. pollution in other countries I was
  229. like we need to leverage engineers. So
  230. what I realized in Leob a lot of the
  231. studies went into sustainability but on
  232. an engineering field like
  233. energy optimization. I studied me
  234. mythology and I never had any lecture
  235. about sustainability. Nothing at all.
  236. And I was like
  237. >> this is weird. there's a study
  238. it's called environmental protection.
  239. They had some stuff but we in methology
  240. nothing. And I was like we need to we
  241. cannot transform sustainability minded
  242. people to become engineers. It's
  243. impossible. if some someone
  244. who's very idealistic is like we need to
  245. change this and that they don't change
  246. the blast furnace process.,
  247. like people who worked for 20 years in
  248. blast furnace research might change it,
  249. but it's rocket science to change
  250. something there. You can't just maneuver
  251. in there and be like, I will now build a
  252. new blast furnace. So, I was like, we
  253. need to change the engineers of the
  254. future. So, how so how we could we do
  255. this? Let's organize some events and
  256. speeches and presentations of people who
  257. can tell them nice stuff. That's what we
  258. did. We invited some people and then a
  259. lot of people came to us and are like I
  260. also want to be part of this
  261. organization. And we're like there's
  262. nothing to do. And we're three people.
  263. We organizing events. We don't need 16
  264. people for doing that. And then we came
  265. up with this idea of starting a think
  266. tank. It's called Shift Tanks.
  267. >> Yeah.
  268. >> It still exists. But I exited it
  269. September. It's already 3 years. So we
  270. founded it 5 years ago. If you are a
  271. company and you have a problem which
  272. needs to be solved but not just for you,
  273. you can hand it in there. and students
  274. in engineering and I have a lot of PhD
  275. students also
  276. >> and more senior people work on it
  277. completely for free and volunteer and
  278. this is what Chief thinks is doing and
  279. this consumed a lot of my time because
  280. >> we running this thing with I
  281. don't know over 100 people at some point
  282. it was crazy but it was also fun and we
  283. got it got a lot of nice feedback we got
  284. this Austrian sustainability award for
  285. student organizations handed over by the
  286. by Leonardo de Gesla.
  287. >> Okay.
  288. >> Three years ago. this is was my start
  289. in entrepreneurship
  290. and yeah
  291. >> so now maybe we can go to the point that
  292. bring us today which is your
  293. >> sequestra that you are the founder.
  294. So maybe you can tell us what did you
  295. see in the industry that you decided
  296. to go for it?
  297. >>
  298. we talked about this beforehand. You
  299. know if you talk about people in the
  300. sustainability bubble I call it because
  301. right now it's a shrinking bubble again.
  302. Unfortunately it was very big a few
  303. years ago and it got a bit bit bubblier.
  304. You hear a lot that people say we have
  305. all the technologies we just need to
  306. implement them then this is
  307. very true for
  308. energy generation like PV that
  309. >> of course you can implement it but this
  310. is not true for have industrial
  311. production right now if you want to
  312. produce any metal in a green way
  313. >> good luck there's no metal in
  314. the world which is produced green
  315. >> unfortunately we are far off and the
  316. reason is that it's much more complex
  317. than just changing the overall
  318. production process. There's it's so
  319. interconnected everything and I was like
  320. I would like to be involved in something
  321. technologically
  322. challenging
  323. and already when I did my PhD I recycled
  324. wastes from heavy industry. So my PhD
  325. was on recycling slud from the zinc
  326. industry.
  327. >>.
  328. >> And if you recycle any metal, I'm not
  329. talking about just melting a can and
  330. producing or melting a copper coin and
  331. producing a new copper coin. This is
  332. very easy.
  333. >>.
  334. >> But if you recycle a smartphone, you can
  335. get out some of the metals that were in
  336. there. But you will end up at some point
  337. with a residue that's much more complex
  338. to recycle than the last residue you
  339. went in with. And if you would try to
  340. get out any metals there, the next resid
  341. is even more complex. And so this whole
  342. circular economy thing where you can
  343. bring everything back into the loop.
  344. It's I can I can I can tell you why
  345. it is so complex in the methological
  346. field. You can rank metals like gold
  347. is a very very precious and aluminium on
  348. the other side of the spectrum is very
  349. unprecious.
  350. >>.
  351. >> And the more unprecious the metal is
  352. >> the easier it oxidizes.
  353. aluminium is never present as aluminium.
  354. It always has an very thin oxide layer
  355. on top. The problem is if you now have
  356. aluminum and you want to recycle it, you
  357. always lose a little amount to the
  358. slack. Okay? And if you now have
  359. gold, for example, you can recycle it
  360. over and over again. With gold, you can
  361. just remelt and remelt and we'll never
  362. lose any gold. Aluminium is not the same
  363. thing. This is why it gets so complex.
  364. If,
  365. >> if you have a car and you separate all
  366. the different metals of the car and
  367. remelt them, you always will end with
  368. end up with some impurities in the un
  369. noble or unprecious
  370. sorry of the of the of the of the
  371. more precious metal in the unprecious
  372. metal and you can't get it out. And this
  373. is why you always lose material in the
  374. recycling process. And this problem is
  375. unsolved. But I drifted off completely.
  376. I was saying that when I worked on
  377. recycling those sludes, I saw you always
  378. end up with some material that has no
  379. use in the end and it can't go anywhere
  380. really, like in the end you
  381. have some slack and it mostly goes to
  382. landfill all over the world. Actually in
  383. Chile because you're from Chile, Chile
  384. is the biggest copper producer in the
  385. world., of course, because you
  386. worked in this industry. I just just
  387. learned last week that Chile has 13
  388. billion tons of tailings on hypes.
  389. Billion tons on million tons.
  390. >> Okay. Well,
  391. >> there's no use right now for this. So,
  392. this is where our mining and circular
  393. industry
  394. >> how it is really working in real time.
  395. And then I was like, there needs to be a
  396. way to valorize this materials. And then
  397. I came across an article where someone
  398. stored CO2 in a steel slake. I was like,
  399. that's nice because maybe you can use it
  400. to store C2 in the end. If you just
  401. can't use it anymore and it's this slack
  402. is on hypes and unused, maybe at least
  403. you could store CO2 in there, so it
  404. doesn't harm the climate anymore. Then I
  405. looked into it. It's a field that's been
  406. around since years already. And we then
  407. started. So I asked my boss at
  408. university, can I have a small research
  409. budget? and I got I don't know €10, 000
  410. or something like this and I was allowed
  411. to employ a bachelor and a master
  412. student. It was the same guy who did his
  413. bachelor thesis and then master thesis.
  414. And we looked into carbonation of
  415. steel slack and just tried what already
  416. was
  417. yeah already proven in the literature
  418. that you can store CO2 in a steel slack.
  419. And this is what we tried and then I was
  420. like if I would ever found a company I
  421. think this would be a really big lever
  422. because nobody's doing it like
  423. >> on scale right now with nobody
  424. very very small amount of companies.
  425. >> Yeah. there's a huge potential and it's
  426. technologically very challenging. So I
  427. also wanted to do something which is
  428. very hard to do technologically and then
  429. I thought I will work as a
  430. consultant now for a few years build
  431. some contacts in the industry. I was
  432. thought about 3 years but I didn't make
  433. it far. I just worked six months until I
  434. started to found a startup on the side
  435. and then I
  436. tried to look for some motivated
  437. co-founders.
  438. >>.
  439. >> Then we started. So okay I am mind blown
  440. with the figures the numbers
  441. it's a huge
  442. >> I read somewhere that you are aiming to
  443. reduce the entire greenhouse gases
  444. >> in 10% that you can store 10% of the CO2
  445. >> yeah in
  446. >> this number also blew my mind but I
  447. didn't come up with it as a
  448. researcher you need to read a lot of
  449. literature all the time and there are
  450. some journals that are very high ranked.
  451. one of them is science.
  452. >> Yeah, sure.
  453. >> So, there was a science article I just
  454. stumbled across and they analyzed all
  455. the mineral wastes in the world and how
  456. much CO2 you could potentially store and
  457. how much CO2 would be stored if those
  458. materials would be utilized in the
  459. building sector. You don't so you don't
  460. have to mine fresh materials for
  461. concrete, . So you carbonate the
  462. steel slack and use it as a replacement
  463. for fresh concrete and this in the whole
  464. world sums up and this is a cons
  465. conservative study. There's also one
  466. which gives double the amount of CO2
  467. storage actually I like before it's a
  468. nature paper another science paper is
  469. equally high ranked. If you store CO2 in
  470. all the mineral wastes in the world, you
  471. can store 400 million tons of CO2. And
  472. if you utilize this materials, you will
  473. save an other
  474. around 3.6 billion tons and this is 4
  475. billion tons and this is 10% of the
  476. global emissions. So we don't we didn't
  477. come up with this number but we used it
  478. a lot in our calculations.
  479. The potential is big because if you look
  480. just
  481. just just in just the steel sector
  482. for every ton of steel you produce you
  483. produce around 2 to 300 kilogram of
  484. blast furnace slack and 150 to 300 it
  485. ranges on 150 to 300 of basic basic
  486. oxygen furnace lag. both of them.
  487. >>.
  488. >> And both of them can take up around 20%
  489. of CO2 if you do it the right way.
  490. >> So it's big numbers
  491. >> a lot. And well the sequestra is an
  492. Spanish word, right?
  493. >> Yes. This is
  494. >> which is to capture
  495. >> to kidnap. I was told
  496. >> kid. Yeah. Yeah.
  497. >> To capture. If you store CO2 or if you
  498. take CO2 and store it underground or
  499. store it in a way so it doesn't harm the
  500. climate anymore. This term is considered
  501. as sequestration
  502. >> sequestration.
  503. >> So in German it's sequestr in English
  504. sequestration. So like sequestr sounds
  505. nice. So let's take this name. Then we
  506. secured the name and that's that's
  507. >> cool.
  508. >> So you have this like residual
  509. waste from the industry you are
  510. putting carbon
  511. >> on it like fixed it to the material
  512. and then you use that material like part
  513. of the construction.
  514. >> So this is how it would end this would
  515. would work in the end. Yes. how we hope
  516. that it would work for many residues. We
  517. as a not planning to do this ever. We
  518. are a technology developer. So we
  519. develop the technologies for steel plans
  520. to do this in the end.
  521. >>.
  522. >> But we are not planning to take in big
  523. hypes of slack and carbonate them and
  524. sell the carbonated slack. In the end,
  525. it would look like this.
  526. We need to decide
  527. what is hard to abate and what is
  528. I wouldn't say not hard to abate but
  529. easier to compensate you the hard to
  530. abate sector there are few industries
  531. which are not possible to decarbonize
  532. right now it's cement waste incineration
  533. and the refractory industry refractory
  534. industry is if you take materials
  535. mineral materials and make bricks out of
  536. them that are used in furnaces and stuff
  537. like this. A refractory industry in
  538. Austria. It's RHI Magnesita is a very
  539. big company. They are worldwide active
  540. and the reason is if you take cement and
  541. if you produce cement 2/3 of the CO2
  542. come from the input material you have
  543. calcium carbonate you calcate CO2 goes
  544. out you have calcium oxide and this has
  545. the binding properties of cement. So it
  546. doesn't matter what energy carrier you
  547. use, CO2 is emitted. The same is for
  548. waste incineration. But
  549. >> there's also a potential for the
  550. cement industry using concrete as well
  551. to store, right?
  552. >> Yeah. In the end, in the end. Yes. Yes.
  553. Yes. But right now they are looking into
  554. this problem. I just attended this
  555. number will blow your mind now because
  556. it blow my mind big time. I already knew
  557. it before a little bit. But two months
  558. ago, I was at a conference. It was by
  559. accident in Vienna. was called the
  560. global cement carbon capture utilization
  561. and storage
  562. >> conference
  563. only conference only dedicated to carbon
  564. capture utilization in the cement sector
  565. >> they calculated that for a medium-sized
  566. cement plant it means like 1 million ton
  567. per year it's not very big it's not very
  568. small 1 million ton clinker production
  569. per year a carbon capture plant will
  570. cost €1 billion
  571. >> this is more than a cement plant, you
  572. know,
  573. >> like this.
  574. >> so now they are they are looking
  575. into this. The same is for waste
  576. incineration. You will never get rid of
  577. residual waste in a city,
  578. right? Everybody's talking about
  579. circular economy. But if you look what
  580. happens right now, people are still
  581. throwing out everything. And where does
  582. it go? A lot of it goes good to
  583. recycling. Good. But a lot of it goes
  584. into waste incineration plants. It's
  585. burned to generate electricity in
  586. Austria and also in Germany. you're not
  587. allowed to landfill residual waste. In
  588. many other countries, put it into
  589. landfill still. But in Austria, you need
  590. to put it into waste incineration. And
  591. this will come up in all countries in
  592. the world. All the developing countries
  593. are looking at this technology like this
  594. is perfect because we could get rid of
  595. our hypes
  596. >> and you and we generate
  597. >> Yeah. And turn heat and electricity. But
  598. hard to bait. C2 goes out,
  599. like
  600. >> and look at just one step back.
  601. >> Yes.
  602. what are the technologies for carbon
  603. capture and utilization what are the
  604. different technologies and then also you
  605. you can explain a bit about what is your
  606. technology
  607. >> yes and I'm just saying those
  608. are the industries that need to
  609. extract CO2 from the off gas they don't
  610. have have any other possibility to get
  611. rid of their emissions so now they need
  612. to capture CO2
  613. >> okay
  614. >> there are different technologies but
  615. they are also constantly evolving Tell
  616. us about the storage process. How how
  617. the carbon are getting stored in
  618. different
  619. >> Yeah, this is later first you
  620. need to capture it.
  621. >> Yeah,
  622. >> this is you call it point source
  623. capture. Point source means there's one
  624. source where CO2 is emitted.
  625. >> And here you could install an ANC scrub
  626. or cryogenic or membrane technology.
  627. Another technology is
  628. >> direct air capture to suck it out of
  629. the air. It's much more expensive right
  630. now but it's also being developed. Then
  631. you have the CO2 present. Okay. Okay,
  632. >> let's say you have it now running out of
  633. the carbon capture plant in a liqufied
  634. form. So you have the carbon capture
  635. plant and the liquifier. So what do you
  636. do then with it? I have to say there are
  637. almost no plants in Europe that do this
  638. right now. In America, yes, but it's a
  639. different topic. They now go into the
  640. technological field of carbon capture of
  641. and storage., carbon capture
  642. and storage means
  643. storing CO2 underground in an old oil
  644. reservoir.
  645. >>.
  646. >> Or old gas reservoir.
  647. >>.
  648. >> The problem is right now there are
  649. around 400 if I'm not wrong million tons
  650. of capacity of carbon capture
  651. installed in the world. Yeah. 450
  652. but around 90% of this is enhanced
  653. oil recovery. So what they do is in
  654. America is very big. They take out the
  655. CO2 from the offers of a cement plant or
  656. of a coal fired power plant even worse
  657. and then they liquefy it and pump it
  658. into oil reservoirs to squeeze out more
  659. oil. This is how this is the climate
  660. technology. This is a as a enhanced oil
  661. recovery technology.
  662. >> So using CO2 to pump
  663. >> yeah this is a very major industrial
  664. widely used process enhanced oil
  665. recovery. So now we considered CO2 is
  666. somewhere in an off gas or in the
  667. atmosphere you extract it from this
  668. media which is much easier in a
  669. point source.
  670. >>.
  671. >> Because in a cement plant off gas you
  672. have around 15% of CO2. In the
  673. atmosphere you have 420 ppms. You can
  674. imagine how much more air you need to
  675. put through a process to get out the
  676. same amount of CO2. This is why it's so
  677. expensive. But in the end you have CO2.
  678. Now you could store it underground in
  679. America using it for bringing out more
  680. oil. Unfortunately in Europe they're
  681. going more into underground storage
  682. where it reacts with formations
  683. underground and stays there forever.
  684. >> Solid
  685. >> solid as a carbonet. This is what we do
  686. as well but we do it above ground and
  687. store it in a waste material. So we use
  688. a steel slack. A steel slack contains
  689. chemical compounds that can take up CO2.
  690. They are calcium and magnesium are the
  691. most important ones. If you have any
  692. material also if you break down this
  693. building and take the building rubble
  694. mill it finally you can carbonate it.
  695. You can store CO2 in there
  696. >> and this material is then carbonated
  697. >> and then it could be used in a building
  698. application and as soon it as it is used
  699. in a building application it's
  700. considered as carbon capture
  701. utilization. So you don't this is a bit
  702. bit misleading but because you don't use
  703. the CO2 you use a material that contains
  704. the CO2 but it's considered a CO2 disase
  705. and now a very important point
  706. until a few years ago actually until
  707. last year in July it's not it's still
  708. very fresh many major industrial players
  709. had the plan to build carbon capture
  710. plants to get rid of their emissions
  711. yeah
  712. >> and sell the CO2 to the chemical
  713. industry to produce
  714. fuels or plastics. The problem is what
  715. happens to a fuel? It gets burnt and the
  716. CO2 is out again. The same is with
  717. plastics. You can produce a nice plastic
  718. structure but then you recycle it maybe
  719. once, twice, three times, it degrades
  720. and at a certain point it is burnt and
  721. then it's also out again. So the EU
  722. brought out a law, the European
  723. Commission brought out a delegated act
  724. for the whole EU which says every
  725. molecule of CO2 that's used in the
  726. building sector is utilization and
  727. everything else is an emission. This is
  728. our biggest tailwind at Sequestra right
  729. now because until now we had to compete
  730. with the chemical industry. you
  731. can take CO2 and transform it into a
  732. green fuel. You can still do it, but you
  733. have to pay the emissions fine for that.
  734. And this is not a good deal. So, I know
  735. it's confusing to have the overload
  736. picture. There is a cement plant.
  737. >>.
  738. >> You take the CO2 out of the of the of
  739. the of gas in a few years. Right now,
  740. >>.
  741. >> no cement plant has a carbon capture
  742. plant, but they all planning to do it.
  743. And then you have waste materials. They
  744. can come from everywhere you could be
  745. steel slack. It can waste be waste
  746. incineration ash. It can be building
  747. rubble. It can be mining tailings from
  748. Chile.
  749. >>. All of them can take more or less
  750. CO2. Depends on the material. And then
  751. you use it in a brick. CO2 utilization.
  752. No fines paid anymore for this CO2.
  753. >> No taxes for using it.
  754. >> For using it.
  755. >> Yeah.
  756. >> No. Now, as soon as you use this
  757. material, the CO2 is considered
  758. permanently stored because as a
  759. carbonet, it's not released at any
  760. times until you heat the material up to
  761. 1, 000°, which does not happen with a
  762. normal building material at any times
  763. once the building is built. If you break
  764. down a house and want to recycle this
  765. rubble, you mill it and use it as a
  766. recycling concrete, but you don't heat
  767. it up to 1, 000°. So this carbonate stays
  768. a carbonate and this is why it's
  769. considered permanent.
  770. >> Wow.
  771. >> Thank you for explaining it because
  772. decarbonization for a very long time
  773. was also accounting problem that
  774. everything was happening at Excel.
  775. >> How to put
  776. >> Yeah.
  777. >> put off the Yeah.
  778. >> Yes.
  779. >> It was still in there but it was in the
  780. Excel sheets. It was going from here and
  781. there
  782. >> but so just the just going back to so
  783. the technology of sequestra.
  784. >> Yes. this.
  785. >> So how did it differ?
  786. >> Now it gets into we were we talked now
  787. about carbon capture storage and
  788. utilization. Now we only talking about
  789. the utilization part and here about the
  790. technology
  791. >> that we follow is called mineralization
  792. or carbonation.
  793. >> Yeah
  794. >> carbonation or mineralization means
  795. mineral compound reacts to carbonate.
  796. This is mineralization. Calcium oxide
  797. reacts to calcium carbonate. This occurs
  798. also in nature. If you have a mountain,
  799. if you have a volcano, it blows up, it
  800. brings out new material, carbonates very
  801. slowly, takes up CO2 from the
  802. atmosphere. We do this in a very
  803. enforced, very rapid way. It's called
  804. technological carbonation.
  805. >> Okay?
  806. >> And we there are two major categories.
  807. There are direct and indirect
  808. carbonation. And in we work in direct
  809. carbonation.
  810. >> Okay?
  811. >> So we take the material and carbonate
  812. the whole material directly..
  813. >> Indirect would be you leech out the
  814. carbonatable phase like calcium oxide
  815. and carbonate only this phase and then
  816. you have pure calcium carbonate. This is
  817. not what we do. We take the whole slack
  818. material for example steel slack
  819. carbonate the whole thing and here you
  820. have three sub categories wet dry and
  821. semi-d dry and we work in wet process
  822. carbonation. The reason is the kinetics
  823. are higher so it reacts faster in a
  824. slurry. We mix the material with a
  825. slurry with water to a slurry. and
  826. injects CO2 and reacts with the water.
  827. CO2 reacts with the water to
  828. different
  829. pre-steps and then to the carbonate. And
  830. this is what we do and this differs to
  831. some of our competitors. They use other
  832. processes or or so many many companies
  833. try to produce something as it's
  834. called supplementary cementitious
  835. materials. So in the cement industry you
  836. can use other materials other than
  837. cement as cement but for this you need
  838. binding properties of the material. We
  839. don't work in this field right now.
  840. Maybe in the future we produce
  841. everything that's not an SEM right now.
  842. So because we have a wet process so the
  843. hydraulic properties are already
  844. destroyed. Our materials are very
  845. quickly carbonated then used as a
  846. filler. And what we do different at
  847. Sequestra we have one focus point.
  848. Sequestra is not a heavy industrial
  849. green tech company, just a heavy
  850. industrial green tech company. We are a
  851. hybrid between big data and
  852. yeah, heavy industrial green tech and
  853. big data and AI is a big word.
  854. >> Yeah.
  855. >> But what we tried to do is if you take
  856. steel slack and then you take a steel
  857. slack from another steel plant, they are
  858. different.
  859. So it's not steeling is not always the
  860. same and if I take a tailing from Chile
  861. it's also not the same. So I always need
  862. different process conditions and the
  863. problem is slack what I said before and
  864. industrial residue is very complex and
  865. iron ore is super straightforward you
  866. know you have also some minological
  867. faces and it's a complex material but
  868. the slag afterwards most likely more
  869. complex.
  870. So it always differs and it's very hard
  871. to tell why it's good for carbonation
  872. and why not. And we stop this approach
  873. of looking into the material in a very
  874. nitty-gritty way and doing all this
  875. microscopic analytics. We just do rapid
  876. empirical testing.
  877. So we take the material and try to
  878. carbonate it and see if it does
  879. carbonation or not.
  880. >> Yeah.
  881. >> And this in a fully automated way in a
  882. small reactor. So we built a reactor
  883. which takes in a sample, does a test,
  884. puts out the sample, takes the next
  885. sample, does the next test and can
  886. variate process parameters and this
  887. completely automated. And with this we
  888. want to generate a lot of data
  889. automatically and become we call it the
  890. global leader in carbonation
  891. intelligence. We want to be the company
  892. that knows more about carbonation than
  893. anyone else
  894. >> following a semi-liant rapid testing big
  895. data approach. So we just test the hell
  896. out of materials super fast and build up
  897. this big data and then with models
  898. predict this material. in the
  899. end it could go as far as can I tell a
  900. steel plant to run their process a
  901. little bit different so the slack looks
  902. a little bit different and then I
  903. process it in this parameter set so it
  904. goes into this building application in
  905. the most economic feasible way is super
  906. niche of course I know I see your faces.
  907. No,
  908. >> it's actually very interesting but also
  909. it's challenging us.
  910. >> Yeah, I'm sorry but it's very very niche
  911. where we are in a niche. I told
  912. you like there are categories down and
  913. we in the super niche of slurry
  914. carbonation here we even more niche
  915. >> with one technique and then to test
  916. every material and to have a catalog
  917. like
  918. >> yes we follow approach like if you
  919. send us a material as a customer want to
  920. know how much CO2 can my can take my
  921. material up
  922. >> we will anonymize your material we don't
  923. care what it is you can we run it
  924. through the same process
  925. every time like a big big blood testing
  926. lab. We just see what it does.
  927. this very rapidly and here we are the
  928. first in the world. Nobody has ever done
  929. this and nobody's doing it right now. So
  930. our engineering team half of our
  931. engineering capacity are meatronics
  932. engineers. So we are very deep in
  933. automatic
  934. reactors right now. Was this your piss
  935. to the investor as well that they
  936. were like I don't know what you're
  937. talking about. You're making a lot of
  938. sense to take the money and
  939. >> yeah this this is a whole different
  940. topic right now I was just
  941. talking about the technical part but
  942. this is what we do. We have two
  943. departments at sequestra one is called
  944. sequestra intelligence where we want to
  945. become the leader of global carbon
  946. global carbonation intelligence.
  947. >> Yeah.
  948. >> And then we have sequester industrial.
  949. Here we try to build reactors that would
  950. actually do this than out at the steel
  951. plant.
  952. >> So we sent use that our customer value
  953. proposition is as follows. You send
  954. us a sample of your material. We run
  955. it through our process. We can tell you
  956. this material can take up 60 m% of CO2.
  957. >> Yeah.
  958. >> and the process on industrial scale
  959. would cost XY Z. We can set up this
  960. plant for XY Z. And with the CO2 price
  961. rising to this level, you could earn
  962. blah blah blah as much money and the
  963. material could go into this industry in
  964. this country. This is where we want to
  965. go in the next years and then sell the
  966. plant and such an industrial industrial
  967. mineralization plant.
  968. >> this is done big projects.
  969. They cost a few dozen million euros and
  970. this is done major industrial plant
  971. engineering. We are far away from this
  972. right now. Right now we are very strong
  973. on this analytical side and starting to
  974. build the first reactor
  975. >> right now like you're you're processing
  976. a lot of different materials and
  977. graduating big
  978. >> right now actually we don't process so
  979. many industrial materials we
  980. calculated slack compositions ourselves
  981. and just produce them ourselves. So we
  982. work with synthetics legs where you
  983. where we can rule out disturbances and
  984. just train our technology.
  985. >> Okay.
  986. >> This will be right.
  987. >> Where where you getting those material
  988. from?
  989. >> So we are methologists. So we just
  990. calculated slack compositions.
  991. >> We bought the materials. We sent them
  992. >> to a partner. They did the melting.
  993. >> Yeah.
  994. >> And then we sent them to another
  995. partner. They did the milling. And now
  996. we have I don't know how many buckets
  997. of synthetic very pure, very precise
  998. like materials. And you said
  999. precisely it's not just for the heavy
  1000. industry but you're somewhere in
  1001. between that it can be used not
  1002. because of the intelligence what you're
  1003. doing.
  1004. >> Yeah.
  1005. >> But primarily it's still the hard to
  1006. abate sector right like the metal sector
  1007. >> there there is an urge for getting rid
  1008. of CO2.
  1009. >> Yeah. M
  1010. >> and with this new law that CO2 that's
  1011. only storing building materials, there's
  1012. a big potential for the building
  1013. sector to store CO2 in their building
  1014. materials. So we talk mostly to
  1015. companies that have huge quantities of
  1016. waste materials that sell them to the
  1017. building sector already. So our for
  1018. example, a very good case for us is the
  1019. readymix concrete set., ready
  1020. mixed concrete are those trucks with the
  1021. funnels on the back that go to the
  1022. construction site
  1023. >> because this product is already wet and
  1024. we have a wet process. So, you don't
  1025. need to dry the slack before mixing it
  1026. into the ready mix concrete. So, we a
  1027. good approach for us would be you have
  1028. ready mixed concrete side. You bring
  1029. some slack from the steel industry there
  1030. and some CO2 from the cement industry.
  1031. Carbonate the slack and mix it into the
  1032. ready mix concrete. And the business
  1033. case in the end is that the building
  1034. industry, this ready mixed concrete
  1035. >> plant, this this company can,
  1036. the cement industry would pay in a
  1037. few years they're calculating like 2030
  1038. they're calculating €140 per ton of
  1039. emission fines. So the cement industry
  1040. would
  1041. have to pay €140 for every ton. It's
  1042. a lot of money for a cement because a
  1043. typical cement plant
  1044. >> Yeah.
  1045. >> emits 6 700, 000 tons with one million
  1046. ton of production. So you can calculate
  1047. how much money this is. You would have
  1048. to pay in fines. So the ready mix
  1049. concrete producer could say I take your
  1050. CO2. you extracted it from the
  1051. off gas. Now it cost you like €4 per ton
  1052. or 50. Now you still have 90 that
  1053. you're saving. So you're extracting it
  1054. and I take it and storing my material
  1055. and I will I will do this for €8 you
  1056. know good deal less than the fine and
  1057. this is the business case behind it and
  1058. for this we built analytical and
  1059. industrial technologies for this
  1060. carbonation
  1061. >> how I think did you I know I talk too
  1062. much rather so
  1063. it's great but these are the
  1064. incentive right like for the industry
  1065. why they should be doing it and also the
  1066. pressure on them
  1067. >> it's not only the price. If you look at
  1068. the emission trading system, first of
  1069. all, the prices get high and second, the
  1070. emission certificates in total get less.
  1071. At a certain point, you're not allowed
  1072. to emit anything anymore. Doesn't matter
  1073. how much money you have. In Europe, they
  1074. so they drop every company out of the
  1075. business that's not able to reduce their
  1076. emissions. And like I said before, we
  1077. have hard to evade industries, cement,
  1078. refractory, and waste incineration. they
  1079. are very very hard hit and then you have
  1080. companies which have it also very hard
  1081. but a bit less hard for example the
  1082. steel sector
  1083. >> the steel sector can decarbonize with
  1084. greener electricity the cement industry
  1085. or not and this is the incentive to get
  1086. rid of this is a lot of CO2 and right
  1087. now this is also many people don't don't
  1088. really know it but if we talk about
  1089. carbon capture and storage this is
  1090. forbidden in Austria you're not
  1091. even allowed to do it right now they are
  1092. re-evaluating it But the problem is we
  1093. are very slow with everything. So if you
  1094. would now build so the cement plant
  1095. needs to get rid of the CO2 otherwise
  1096. they need to close the shop at some
  1097. point.
  1098. >> But if they would extract the CO2 right
  1099. now they have nowhere to go with it. So
  1100. they don't invest into the plans right
  1101. now. There's a very very interesting and
  1102. dynamic field right now. When I was at
  1103. this conference, I was sitting in this
  1104. room. There was like 100 people from all
  1105. over the world like scientists and CEOs
  1106. from leading cement companies and they
  1107. were openly talking about and nobody
  1108. knows what to do right now., it
  1109. was really interesting. It was like
  1110. at the forefront of something big
  1111. happening, like
  1112. >> we have this and this problem.
  1113. >> My my question about the implementation
  1114. challenge like that you're going to
  1115. face. What do you think like going
  1116. forward?
  1117. >> Yeah. Yeah,
  1118. >> first I want to know from you that
  1119. the industry that you want to
  1120. target and you feel that they are going
  1121. to be the first first pilot or the
  1122. first people that you would like to
  1123. reach out to and that you already
  1124. imagining working with and then what are
  1125. going to be the implementation challenge
  1126. going forward. Yeah. So right now we are
  1127. talking to a few different companies
  1128. already. So what they want to do and
  1129. this is a very big business case for us
  1130. for the next years you don't
  1131. always need to go you have an idea and
  1132. you need to plan it on this industrial
  1133. scale it doesn't work like this
  1134. a very big business case for us is
  1135. finding out for companies if they have a
  1136. case with their material or not
  1137. >> if you are a steel plant and you have 10
  1138. million tons of steel on a hype because
  1139. you were supposed to landfill it and now
  1140. maybe you could bring it to the building
  1141. sector
  1142. You need to find out if you can store
  1143. CO2 or not and how much the
  1144. process would cost and we try to find
  1145. this out for companies. So sequester
  1146. intelligence is supposed to find out if
  1147. a material has a potential or not.
  1148. >> Yeah.
  1149. >> So this is where we move right now and
  1150. what the companies then want to know is
  1151. how would it work on a pre-industrial
  1152. scale. So they would don't want to
  1153. carbonate 10 million tons in 5 years.
  1154. They want to just try it out with a few
  1155. hundred kilos, .
  1156. >> Exactly.
  1157. >> And right now we are having
  1158. Yeah. Fortunately, it's a very good
  1159. situation right now. a few leads
  1160. where we could maybe build those
  1161. demonstration plans for companies. So
  1162. they want to have those demonstrators on
  1163. site.
  1164. >> Yeah.
  1165. >> And can carbonate some steel slack and
  1166. try out different stuff. And there are
  1167. not many plant companies right now that
  1168. can build mineralization or they
  1169. they can
  1170. >> that are in this field.
  1171. >>.
  1172. >> So we got approached by big by some very
  1173. big companies. it's not right now but
  1174. it's maybe in one or two years u we
  1175. could be already setting up some of
  1176. those and this is how we move forward
  1177. right now
  1178. >> and still we are a startup
  1179. >> to build a plant it's hard and big
  1180. >> so we see a very big case in this
  1181. evaluating and securing IP
  1182. >> do you already have IP
  1183. >> we filed three patents already
  1184. >> yeah and is in the process right now.
  1185. >> One is already published. You can look
  1186. it up if you want.
  1187. >> What is it about?
  1188. >> This is about fully automated data
  1189. generation for carbonation and applying
  1190. on industrial scale. So we patented this
  1191. whole thing of generating the data in
  1192. sequester intelligence and applying it
  1193. in sequester industrial.
  1194. >> So machine learning driven optimization
  1195. of processes for carbonation. This is
  1196. what we patented
  1197. >> and that you got it.
  1198. >> Yeah, we got it. we filed it
  1199. now. It's it's published and now we need
  1200. to enforce it in different countries and
  1201. we will try this I don't know in now
  1202. it's published I think now we have 12
  1203. more month to enforce it in the end.
  1204. yeah
  1205. >> I have a question regarding the
  1206. European law that you mentioned. Do you
  1207. think that it's it's going to have an
  1208. impact in the
  1209. prices of the construction material like
  1210. to be differentiation with others
  1211. like hey I can sell I can sell my
  1212. product with carbon inside so you can
  1213. >> yeah it like they are already doing this
  1214. if you look at the big cement
  1215. producers they talk about green cement
  1216. it's not green yet but it's greener
  1217. >> of
  1218. I worked as a sustainability
  1219. consultant before founding this startup
  1220. and I worked on a time where I was the
  1221. biggest driver and sustainability
  1222. consult consultancy that was ever there.
  1223. It was two years ago. We went to
  1224. companies and you could charge whatever
  1225. you want. everybody wanted to
  1226. lower their emissions and print nice
  1227. sustainability reports and was the
  1228. biggest topic ever. And back then
  1229. everybody was talking about building
  1230. green and we need the greenest
  1231. materials.
  1232. >> Right now this whole bubble burst a
  1233. little bit it got much less
  1234. important. America moved way
  1235. far away now from all these topics and
  1236. they have a big things to say in the
  1237. industry still. in Trump
  1238. now they're building new blast furnaces
  1239. and opening new coal mines and stuff
  1240. like this. So this whole drive
  1241. unfortunately got a little bit away but
  1242. what we see is that it's still very
  1243. important for the European industry for
  1244. the hard to bait and industrial sector
  1245. because they know it's a hard topic and
  1246. you need to work on it for years and
  1247. years and years and still yes they are
  1248. trying to charge more for greener cement
  1249. but it's not as important anymore but it
  1250. will for sure be it always goes in loops
  1251. if it doesn't go in a loop right now we
  1252. all done
  1253. >> we don't need to talk about This
  1254. is already very late anyways. But I
  1255. see that the whole sustainability
  1256. thing got much less important.
  1257. like two three years ago every everybody
  1258. was buying a lassen Do
  1259. what this is? This those bikes where you
  1260. can transport stuff.
  1261. >> Last mile last mile
  1262. >> last mile transport like was
  1263. everywhere and don't throw away
  1264. straws and Brad no people don't care. M
  1265. I don't know it just got less but
  1266. still the industrial sector is still
  1267. very hard on decarbonization because
  1268. they know you can't just start and do it
  1269. in two years.
  1270. >> I don't know if you're related with the
  1271. the construction like the
  1272. certification in the construction
  1273. construction field.
  1274. >> Yeah.
  1275. >> because they speak about zero
  1276. carbon buildings or houses. so do
  1277. you think that this can have an impact
  1278. also in this certification?
  1279. >> Yeah, this has a big impact. Yeah. Yeah.
  1280. This
  1281. >> get carbon or something.
  1282. >> Yeah. Yeah. they did a lot of stuff,
  1283. building with wood, building
  1284. using adding
  1285. ch biochar to concrete, storing
  1286. CO2 in materials. Zero carbon is
  1287. nothing, like there's nothing
  1288. zero carbon right now, unfortunately.
  1289. But it is big. And yes, this is al
  1290. also of course an input.
  1291. We want to get smarter in this field as
  1292. well. And we also have people who work
  1293. just in this field like building
  1294. materials.
  1295. >> Still our niche is the carbonation
  1296. and there is importance to
  1297. it. but this is such a how should you
  1298. say the
  1299. stuff that's connected to physics
  1300. >> and how to carbonate a material in the
  1301. optimal way is the same in 10 years than
  1302. it is now but this regulation
  1303. about what's green in the building
  1304. sector is changing every year. So we
  1305. observe it but right now we are way too
  1306. early anyways to talk
  1307. >> in this industry we are focusing on if
  1308. someone wants to carbonate materials and
  1309. a lot of people want to do this how can
  1310. you do it in the most
  1311. >> efficient way
  1312. >> efficient way this is
  1313. >> sector agnostic yes let's say
  1314. >> yeah we are material agnostic that's
  1315. what I meant before if you send us it
  1316. must be mineral but otherwise it doesn't
  1317. store CO2 it must contain calcium and
  1318. magnesium
  1319. >> as soon as you have a material lying
  1320. around you can send it to us and we will
  1321. tell you what it can do in terms of CO2
  1322. uptake.
  1323. >>.
  1324. >> And also you're impacted around the
  1325. globe like you're you're startup based
  1326. out of Austria but then I'm sure you're
  1327. getting leads out of all across.
  1328. >> Yeah. Like it was funny you were
  1329. laughing before about the conference I
  1330. was right capturing utilization
  1331. conference. Two weeks ago I was at a
  1332. conference. It was also in Vienna by
  1333. accident. Next year it's somewhere else
  1334. but by accident it was also in Vienna.
  1335. It was called global slag at a
  1336. conference. It's only about slags.
  1337. >> Only waste.
  1338. >> Only slags, not only waste. A slag is
  1339. just the methological waste.
  1340. >> Okay.
  1341. >> So, a slag is if you have a
  1342. pyometological process. Pyomatological
  1343. means heating stuff up to around over
  1344. 1, 00 1, 200° and everything is liquid.
  1345. You have the metal and then you have a
  1346. mineral phase swimming on top of the
  1347. metal which contains everything that's
  1348. not the metal.
  1349. >> Okay.
  1350. >> And this is a slack.
  1351. >> Impurities or
  1352. >> Yeah. impurities. Like if you have an
  1353. iron ore, you have iron and calcium,
  1354. silicon, magnesium, aluminium and all of
  1355. this sums up in the slack. This is a
  1356. slack and slack look like rock material.
  1357. And this conference was only about
  1358. slack, global slack. There were like 250
  1359. people there and there I met a lot of
  1360. people from all over the world from I
  1361. don't know Kazakhstan to South Africa to
  1362. South Korea and of course yeah we could
  1363. work everywhere but right now this is
  1364. another two years down the road right
  1365. now.
  1366. >> yeah so just to I could ask in Chile for
  1367. some interested companies that
  1368. >> Yeah, you can. Yeah.
  1369. >> Yeah. Cool.
  1370. >> I we can spend a lot of time on the
  1371. technology. I figured
  1372. but I would like to also ask you a
  1373. couple of other stuff because you
  1374. you're innovator and it's it's a hard
  1375. tech right like it's it's not it's not
  1376. cool. it's it takes time for
  1377. the for the kind of work that you're
  1378. doing. It's a scaling challenge. You
  1379. already know for a while that it's
  1380. like 3 years down the line that you have
  1381. to do something. So you need a lot of
  1382. patience. But what specific
  1383. opportunities and challenges that you
  1384. see for Austria and within the
  1385. region for innovators like
  1386. >> for innovators
  1387. >> for more green tech challenges more more
  1388. more difficult challenges not not cool
  1389. stuff but more more in where you
  1390. really need to innovate.
  1391. >> Yeah this is a very good question. You
  1392. know what I invited in
  1393. two weeks we have a party.
  1394. >> Yeah.
  1395. >> why?
  1396. >> Why?
  1397. >> Tell us why. why we do this?
  1398. Because I realized that the climate tech
  1399. bubble in Austria doesn't exist. There's
  1400. no climate tech bubble because with I'm
  1401. talking about industrial climate tech.
  1402. >> there are a few companies but clean
  1403. technology development in startup
  1404. ecosystem is not happening. I was part
  1405. of the entrepreneurial leadership
  1406. program of Austrian startups which was
  1407. very nice. It's a boot camp program.
  1408. >>.
  1409. >> Takes one years. Shout out to the guys
  1410. very guys and girls there was very nice
  1411. met some very good friends but I was
  1412. the only guy doing hardware and then my
  1413. co-founder was in a batch one year later
  1414. only guy doing hardware
  1415. >> not talking about green tech just
  1416. hardware that everybody's doing
  1417. software startups so the hard thing in
  1418. Austria is finding anyone you can talk
  1419. to about your startup to start from you
  1420. know like there is no bubble and we need
  1421. to get better in this manufacturing
  1422. right like
  1423. >> manufacturing ing also like
  1424. I know some hardware startups but like
  1425. people who had how we started
  1426. we started in the workshop of my
  1427. co-founder we with our own money we buy
  1428. a laptop a scale a tube some pipes and
  1429. started carbonating lime from the from
  1430. the workshop like like like you use
  1431. at the construction site from from
  1432. balmax
  1433. >> we started to carbonate this in our
  1434. workshop and now we're trying to scale
  1435. it into industry. If you want to talk to
  1436. fellow farmers, you don't find them in
  1437. Austria. And this is a big pity. And
  1438. what's the challenge? There's no
  1439. ecosystem for it. We have a super good
  1440. grant system in Austria. Like the one of
  1441. the best in the world. If you want to
  1442. get free money as a startup owner, you
  1443. should come to Austria. There's a lot of
  1444. grant money, but we have no
  1445. infrastructure for if you if you try to
  1446. build a chemical reactor. Have fun
  1447. finding a workshop. It took us a year to
  1448. find something., in Sweden they
  1449. have green tech hubs where you have a
  1450. office building on top and in the ground
  1451. floor you have a workshop where you can
  1452. do whatever to scale up to a few hundred
  1453. kilos of batch processing.
  1454. >> I know EU funded a project in Sweden
  1455. called hybrid. They're also making
  1456. >> hybrid. Yeah, they're making green
  1457. material, green metals.
  1458. I think they got 100 million fund from
  1459. EU or something and yeah
  1460. >> I don't know that but yeah Sweden is
  1461. another thing in Austria we
  1462. have so many good engineers but not a
  1463. real lot of entrepreneur entrepreneurial
  1464. drive and if you would start you would
  1465. have a very hard time finding fellow
  1466. founders
  1467. >> and this coming back to the party we now
  1468. started to organize climate tech parties
  1469. >> where we bring people together not just
  1470. people who are already in the climate
  1471. tech sector but also some are
  1472. engineers but they don't have an entre
  1473. entrepreneurial spirit but maybe they
  1474. meet someone there and thinking co-found
  1475. startup and I was looking and waiting
  1476. for someone to invite me to climatic
  1477. party but I was done waiting so we're
  1478. organizing
  1479. >> we will invite you we already did it
  1480. on 25th so first we are going to have a
  1481. conference and then we have a party
  1482. >> that's perfect yeah no no I am very very
  1483. I appreciate it a lot that you are
  1484. doing this also because there needs to
  1485. be done more
  1486. >> yes not enough happening so to be
  1487. innovative in Austria grants are perfect
  1488. but finding someone who can help you
  1489. because they did the same thing 3 years
  1490. earlier
  1491. >> but just on that note what do you
  1492. what startup challenges that you think
  1493. in the heavy heavy
  1494. >> I would say there's just a lot of
  1495. opportunity
  1496. >> if you I really until now it was it's
  1497. always hard and a lot of work and you
  1498. need to maneuver fast but you need to do
  1499. this in every startup but getting money
  1500. was easier for us.
  1501. >> No. what what I meant was that that
  1502. more innovative stuff in a green
  1503. green
  1504. >> what could be
  1505. >> yeah what could be potential
  1506. >> oh yeah
  1507. there's so much I'm coming
  1508. from the metological sector I could tell
  1509. you a lot of stuff in the methological
  1510. sector right now for example
  1511. >> head yeah
  1512. >> yeah for example if you look at steel
  1513. production steel emits around 7% of
  1514. global CO2 emissions
  1515. >>.
  1516. Only steel.
  1517. >> Only steel.
  1518. >> They always say if steel would be a
  1519. country, it would be before India. You
  1520. know, in CO2 emissions, that's what they
  1521. always say. So, it's a lot. A lot of
  1522. people know this also and they're like,
  1523. we need to do something about steel
  1524. production.
  1525. >>.
  1526. >> Steel 2 million two billion tons per
  1527. year production of steel.
  1528. >>.
  1529. >> Half of it is in China. 2 billion tons
  1530. per year.
  1531. >> Aluminium is 70 million tons per year.
  1532. So, it's much much much less.
  1533. >> Yeah.
  1534. >> So, steel divided by 30.
  1535. >> Okay. Yeah, it's aluminium. But 3% of
  1536. the CO2 emissions only aluminium. Nobody
  1537. knows that., people like
  1538. aluminium, it's nice. The foil, cool.
  1539. Emits a hell lot of CO2.
  1540. >> Completely untackled problem. If you
  1541. produce aluminium, you produce a sludge.
  1542. It's called red mut.
  1543. >> But you think it's also like for example
  1544. the most steel it produced by China.
  1545. >> Yeah.
  1546. >> And most aluminium I'm not sure. It's
  1547. also
  1548. >> every metal is China except copper then
  1549. >> Chile
  1550. >> and do you think that they're they're
  1551. doing something about that?
  1552. they're doing a lot about
  1553. decarbonization as a whole with PV
  1554. >> it's a lot in China but also a
  1555. lot of somewhere else but there is so
  1556. much opportunity
  1557. and you could found a startup in every
  1558. of those fields and do something and you
  1559. would find customers
  1560. in our fields.
  1561. >> Yeah. mineralization. how many
  1562. startups are there in Europe? We have a
  1563. very comprehensive competition map and
  1564. we think there are not more than 20 all
  1565. over Europe., if you if you if
  1566. you try to
  1567. make a new app for food delivery, you
  1568. have 20 competitors in every city.
  1569. >>.
  1570. I'm just saying and so in
  1571. talking about innovation one of
  1572. our challenges and this will be one of
  1573. our new niches where we maybe move in
  1574. but if someone wants to found something
  1575. this is one of what I think if you want
  1576. to found a startup and want to have an
  1577. idea what to found which which have the
  1578. biggest impact is CO2 logistics. I think
  1579. this will be a major case
  1580. >> for if you need to remove CO2 from
  1581. the off gas of a cement plant, where are
  1582. you going to put it and how? This is
  1583. nature.
  1584. >> if you have a good model that
  1585. can predict the optimal case, is it even
  1586. worth it for this plant to extract CO2
  1587. or should you just shut down the plant
  1588. because it's not worth it? C2 logistics
  1589. just a major case.
  1590. >> now we would like to know about the
  1591. challenges of scaling up and a
  1592. startup here in Austria in Europe
  1593. especially in high-tech as you
  1594. >> a good question.
  1595. >> Yeah. He talked about the ecosystem for
  1596. startup like yourself. So what are the
  1597. unique challenges that you are facing? I
  1598. have to say in our state right now it's
  1599. good because there's a lot of grant
  1600. money in Austria you have a really good
  1601. grant situation you can get big grants
  1602. from the state so
  1603. >> up to 3 million euros there's a very
  1604. famous grant it's called general
  1605. program of FFG buses program you can
  1606. hand in sector agnostic everything you
  1607. want
  1608. >> they decide if they want to fund you can
  1609. get up to €3 million for your project
  1610. budget for 2 or 3 years.
  1611. >>.
  1612. >> And you can do a lot of stuff with
  1613. grant money. For us as a high-tech
  1614. startup, we will reach a point in the
  1615. next years where we will need
  1616. amounts of money that are not really
  1617. there in Austria.
  1618. >>.
  1619. >> And it's a good question.
  1620. This is what again,
  1621. like we don't have this big brother
  1622. where we can look up to and be like, how
  1623. did you do it 3 years ago?.
  1624. >> So you are building it on the way kind
  1625. of
  1626. >> I have to say right now building a
  1627. industrial tech startup. I think we are
  1628. one of the first ever did this out of
  1629. Austria. So, it's very hard to say right
  1630. now, but I think we will do it with a
  1631. good mix of investors money and big
  1632. European grants and just try to Yeah,
  1633. it's always important to gain a lot of
  1634. traction,
  1635. >> to prove that someone in
  1636. the end would buy it at the point where
  1637. it can't sell anything yet. There's
  1638. always this. But do you consider
  1639. maybe for currently you're based out
  1640. of Austria that that you might there
  1641. might come a time that you might have to
  1642. pay somewhere else.
  1643. >> Yeah.
  1644. >> Yeah.
  1645. >> No, this could be the case here.
  1646. >> Right now it's good in Austria. I have
  1647. to say we don't we find good people
  1648. here, engineers.
  1649. >> the current situation is really good.
  1650. also recently there's a big problem
  1651. in Europe because companies get funded
  1652. to a certain stage then the money is not
  1653. here anymore.
  1654. >> Then some of the companies are not good
  1655. enough. They die and some of them are
  1656. really good and what happens they get
  1657. bought up by American investors and go
  1658. over to the US. Now the EU wants to stop
  1659. this because it happened a lot because
  1660. at a certain point you reach a level
  1661. where no European fund can invest the
  1662. sums in American investors can invest.
  1663. in Sweden is a bit different. So
  1664. Sweden, UK, Munich is also a hub. They
  1665. have big startups, but many of them just
  1666. went to the US because they had the big
  1667. money. And now they the European Union
  1668. wants to invest in startups, promising
  1669. ones for them to stay and they just
  1670. published it a few weeks ago that they
  1671. want to invest 70 billion euros in the
  1672. next two or three years. The European
  1673. Investment Bank. So we see right now a
  1674. lot of opportunity and maybe I'm talking
  1675. too much right now but I don't think
  1676. that right now in the next one or two
  1677. years we could completely fail.
  1678. >>.
  1679. >> because what we do is niche and it's
  1680. needed. people need and I know
  1681. it's needed.
  1682. >> Yeah.
  1683. >> And it's very research in
  1684. intensive. And the good thing is if
  1685. you build something like we do the
  1686. importance doesn't fade. if you
  1687. let's say you build something like
  1688. Spotify had a lot of competitors on its
  1689. way but all of them died
  1690. >> for us even if we would now have 10
  1691. competitors. If you're selling, this is
  1692. also one of my what I always say. If you
  1693. want to found something, hair industrial
  1694. green tech is a good field because you
  1695. can never easily dominate a market
  1696. completely because you want to build an
  1697. industrial plant. Investors don't like
  1698. to hear that. You can't but you can't
  1699. really dominate it. If you want to build
  1700. an industrial plant, it consumes a lot
  1701. of capacity and you can't build
  1702. industrial plants all over the world at
  1703. the same time.
  1704. >> Exactly.
  1705. >> Spotify can do that. You can roll out
  1706. the app. No, it's no problem. It's an
  1707. it's it's it's a software, but
  1708. for heavy industrial tech, it's hard to
  1709. dominate a market and this is a big
  1710. opportunity for many different players.
  1711. It levels it out a bit and the market is
  1712. gigantic. Anyways,
  1713. >> like for heavy industrial green tech.
  1714. >> Yeah. No, for sure. We think that you're
  1715. going to make it.
  1716. >> Let's see.
  1717. >> And
  1718. thanks.
  1719. >> You were telling us about the party that
  1720. you're hosting so that there could be
  1721. more robust ecosystem, .
  1722. >> Yeah. What what do you think there
  1723. should should be more done in
  1724. Austria? Vienna as a as a it's
  1725. it's also the epicenter because there
  1726. are so many other regions which look
  1727. forward to Vienna as a center for maybe
  1728. startups going forward. So how can the
  1729. ecosystem get better?
  1730. >> I don't really not a hard question. It's
  1731. a really hard question. What I found
  1732. also like talking about you, I don't
  1733. know you really well. just a few
  1734. weeks but you already make something
  1735. possible. You came from somewhere
  1736. else and just started something and you
  1737. invite 100 people and Leonor was like
  1738. speaking at your event.
  1739. >> There's an Austrian doing this.
  1740. >> I don't know what's going on with the
  1741. Austrian people but most of them are so
  1742. lazy it's fired it's a good
  1743. life anyways. many of my colleagues good
  1744. degrees they work in the industry is
  1745. just perfect my what should I
  1746. do why why should I found anything you
  1747. know it's perfect
  1748. >> what like I don't know
  1749. how we can come up with this drive but
  1750. you just started it apparently it's
  1751. working you managed to invite a lot
  1752. of senior people to your events I don't
  1753. know how you did it actually because
  1754. but it's really good many people
  1755. tried this where they failed big I see
  1756. that a lot of Austrian and founders have
  1757. drive but I don't know I never started
  1758. this startup to earn a lot of money I
  1759. mean on the way maybe
  1760. >> but I always want to do something
  1761. challenging and something in
  1762. sustainability technology if you do this
  1763. and follow something useful that could
  1764. be big it will get big at some point
  1765. maybe not the first thing but many of
  1766. our founders in Austria want to find
  1767. something to become rich and this is not
  1768. a very good incentive. You don't build a
  1769. nice flourishing
  1770. ecosystem I think with too many founders
  1771. who want to build the 20th dating app.
  1772. >> I have no idea how we can do it. and
  1773. our startup ecosystem is good but to
  1774. bring more into this climate tech
  1775. bubble.
  1776. >> Yeah, a party is a good idea.
  1777. >> Parties. Yes. Yes. Yes. I think it's
  1778. really a good idea. to
  1779. >> we're going to support it.
  1780. >> Yeah, sure. Sure.
  1781. >> And yeah, just to maybe going to the
  1782. future,
  1783. >> how do you see the sequestra
  1784. in 2030 for example?
  1785. >> Yeah, like in the best case scenario, we
  1786. would be the leader in carbonation
  1787. intelligence, like having a
  1788. big lab with fully automated machinery
  1789. that's doing this tests..
  1790. >> People are sending us samples and we
  1791. have the most brilliant engineers
  1792. looking at big data models and be like
  1793. yeah I don't know we are we are able to
  1794. predict this and that and we can
  1795. really look into the carbonation as it
  1796. happens and the same time already
  1797. building industrial plants if
  1798. sustainability doesn't die completely
  1799. which I hope it does not but right now.
  1800. I have to be as realistic.
  1801. did you hear what the German
  1802. counselor just said?, it's just all
  1803. everything is going into the wrong
  1804. direction a little bit.
  1805. >> but I still think that there is a
  1806. lot of potential and it will move back.
  1807. It could be very good. It's hard to say.
  1808. Right now, if I could go back and do the
  1809. I think I would found more or less the
  1810. same thing. I would not right now
  1811. advise anyone to go into something that
  1812. just measures sustainability. I would
  1813. urge everyone to go into a direction
  1814. that really develops technologies that
  1815. are used to reduce emissions. When the
  1816. whole sustainability bubble started to
  1817. go big, most startups were platforms
  1818. that measured CO2 in similar to we can
  1819. track all your emissions and many of
  1820. them died right now because
  1821. >> but really bringing down emissions
  1822. technologically
  1823. I would go in this direction. I think
  1824. every startup that goes into the
  1825. direction still has a very bright
  1826. future. just to
  1827. in the advice space here for
  1828. the community that is interested
  1829. maybe to make a
  1830. a startup or or some initiative
  1831. what would you advise in this in this
  1832. regard like would you
  1833. >> not just in entrepreneurship but
  1834. also getting into the sector
  1835. exactly in general
  1836. for energy transition
  1837. >> also you're tackling more mostly the
  1838. industrial decarbonization challenge
  1839. like what kind of job you think and how
  1840. can people get into that
  1841. >> industrial decarbonization challenge
  1842. >> I think there are a lot of people
  1843. already interested in sustainability I
  1844. would like to see more engineers being
  1845. interested in sustainability
  1846. >>.
  1847. And this is what I tried to do with
  1848. Shift Tanks.,
  1849. it's a very odd question. How would you
  1850. do this? Yeah,
  1851. I would just, I at some point
  1852. I gave up motivating people that don't
  1853. want to be motivated.
  1854. >> That's a good
  1855. >> That's a good one.
  1856. >> Yeah, because I wasted a lot of time.
  1857. but I would say if you find
  1858. people that have a certain spark, you
  1859. can just help them. So, what I do all
  1860. the time is I hook up people., I
  1861. meet someone, they tell me blah blah
  1862. blah, I do this or that, and then six
  1863. weeks later, I meet another one. My I
  1864. always remember what people do. I don't
  1865. remember like when my mother tells me
  1866. anything, I don't remember it,
  1867. like two minutes later, I forgot it. But
  1868. if I meet someone at a conference and I
  1869. met him two years ago somewhere, I can
  1870. still remember where this guy studied
  1871. and what he did and blah blah blah. I
  1872. remember all this professional stuff. So
  1873. I always try to connect people and I
  1874. don't really have any advice, but if
  1875. someone already has the spark, you can
  1876. just tell them, hook them up with the
  1877. right people and you should just start.
  1878. I meet a lot of people all the
  1879. time and 6 months later they tell me the
  1880. same again. Yeah. I'm also thinking
  1881. about starting something like what do it
  1882. >> have you done? Yeah.
  1883. >> Yeah. Well, just there's
  1884. this very nice saying the book
  1885. the almanac of no raikant very good book
  1886. I recommend everyone to read it's maybe
  1887. one of the
  1888. >> I will check it out. It's it's really
  1889. good and he has he quotes a lot of
  1890. stuff and one of it is intentions don't
  1891. matter actions do. like talking
  1892. about stuff a lot of people like to talk
  1893. about what they would do.
  1894. >>. I don't know. There's no advice for
  1895. people to interest them in
  1896. sustainability because many people tried
  1897. it and I think you need to utilize
  1898. capacities people have for
  1899. sustainability somehow.
  1900. I don't know it's a hard topic. I
  1901. think I motivated already a lot of
  1902. people in my life to do something in the
  1903. direction of sustainability
  1904. but with many I think it won't just just
  1905. won't happen like some I had a
  1906. friend who was working in
  1907. sustainability and then just shift and
  1908. went to the defense industry was like I
  1909. don't know how this happened but it just
  1910. happened and then
  1911. >> you can't motivate if you if you just
  1912. motivate a few people
  1913. >> that motivation
  1914. Yeah, I heard a saying that it's if
  1915. the ideas will fly, it would be cloudy
  1916. all all day or something like that.
  1917. >> Yes, this is very
  1918. >> is to do things.
  1919. >> This is very true. yeah, many people
  1920. are just afraid to start, but
  1921. >> some of them are not you.
  1922. >>. And some some of them they
  1923. just need
  1924. some kick in the ass and then they do
  1925. something.
  1926. >> Yeah. We invite to the community to do
  1927. and accomplish their dreams and just
  1928. take the jump, right? Like they take the
  1929. leaf and just go for it. That's
  1930. >> Lucas. do you have any last thoughts
  1931. about like how people can engage more
  1932. with the Questra and learn about your
  1933. mission?
  1934. >> Oh, of course., we have a website
  1935. which is mostly updated on LinkedIn. We
  1936. post a lot of stuff.
  1937. we don't have a we have we have
  1938. something where you can sign up but
  1939. yeah I think LinkedIn is the best the
  1940. best thing right now to follow what
  1941. we do but we don't post a lot of
  1942. insights all the time
  1943. >> so most of our work just goes into
  1944. developing but if someone is out there
  1945. who is like I think I'm a very skilled
  1946. engineer doesn't really matter what
  1947. field
  1948. >> and we really trying to hire a topnotch
  1949. team. I think right until now we really
  1950. did very well with a lot of very good
  1951. people
  1952. >> and we also want to hire more very good
  1953. people. So if someone is like I would
  1954. like to get to know this company you can
  1955. just reach out to me and maybe at a
  1956. certain point we can work together also
  1957. other startup founders that want to
  1958. collaborate
  1959. always open for that.
  1960. >> Amazing. yeah this has been a very
  1961. insightful interview. Thank you. I
  1962. have a friend Gabrielle in Chile who is
  1963. metallurgical. So he's he's going to eat
  1964. and we hope to have you again with some
  1965. sequestra updates and we wish you the
  1966. best.
  1967. >> Thank you. It was very nice. Very nice.
  1968. Thank you.
  1969. >> And for the community, thank you for
  1970. watching the this long interview
  1971. until the end and see you in the next
  1972. episode. Chow. Chiao.