← All episodes
Season 1

Energy Security in the CEE Region and AI-Driven Security Solutions - Panel 3- TEB 1st Forum

with Shireen· Austro Papia· 1m

TL;DR

AI's role in energy security faces data and trust challenges.

Synopsis
The panel discusses the intersection of energy security and AI, highlighting the importance of data availability and trust in AI systems. Experts emphasize the need for regulatory frameworks to facilitate AI integration while addressing cybersecurity and geopolitical risks.

Key metrics

by the numbers · 1
  • 15 terawatts
    Power in certification queue

Topics

4 tags
AI integrationenergy securitydata availabilityregulatory challenges
Stats
Duration
35m
Words
5.3k
Questions
40

Timeline

5 chapters
  1. Panel Introduction

    Panelists introduce the topics of energy security and AI.

  2. AI Status Discussion

    Panelists discuss the current status of AI in ensuring energy security.

  3. Trust Issues with AI

    Panelists address the trust issues surrounding AI outputs in energy systems.

  4. Regulatory Perspectives

    Discussion on the need for regulations to ensure safe AI integration in energy.

  5. Future of AI in Energy

    Panelists share expectations for AI's future role in energy security.

Key insights

4 takeaways
  • 01

    Data is crucial for AI

    AI requires high-quality data to function effectively; poor data leads to poor results.

  • 02

    Trust in AI is essential

    Building trust in AI outputs is critical for its acceptance in energy systems.

  • 03

    Regulatory frameworks needed

    Clear regulations are necessary to guide the integration of AI in energy sectors.

  • 04

    Cybersecurity risks present

    Geopolitical and cybersecurity risks must be managed alongside AI deployment.

Pull quotes

2 quotes
  • The biggest hurdle would be the trust issue with AI
    Kobin
  • AI needs to be integrated into a lot of different workflows from planning of energy system to operation
    Shireen
Transcript793 cuesClick a timestamp to jump
  1. So in the middle exactly
  2. so this is the final final discussion
  3. we're having today. So I see the
  4. networking drinks already prepared. So
  5. bear with me. I'm sure it's going to be
  6. pretty interesting with such a panel.
  7. We are talking today about the two the
  8. combination of the two most pressing and
  9. exciting topics in the energy world
  10. which is NSG security and of course
  11. artificial intelligence.
  12. And these two topics play a very
  13. important role in today's society
  14. today's world where geopolitical and
  15. infrastructural challenges require
  16. tailored and forward-looking solutions.
  17. We already had very insightful
  18. presentations. Thank you for that. So
  19. you already know three of our panelists.
  20. We're quite lucky to get have a fourth
  21. one, Shireen from Osloia.
  22. And just to make it fair, may I kindly
  23. ask you to introduce yourself and
  24. present what you're doing, what your
  25. daily work is. Thank you.
  26. >> thank you so much. thanks also
  27. for having me here today and thank you
  28. to Daniel and Rahul for organizing this
  29. great event actually. yeah so
  30. yeah I'm a senior expert at Ostro
  31. Papia. Austroapia is the association of
  32. the of the paper industry of the
  33. Austrian paper industry and we have
  34. 23 members most of them are well
  35. known. So we have like we have Mandi,
  36. we have Hansel, we have ST we have
  37. Mayans. So they are actually global
  38. companies that act in different
  39. parts of the world. yeah and I my
  40. background is also before I joined
  41. Austro Papia in February and before
  42. that I was working for the Austrian
  43. Ministry of Defense and so it's
  44. really interesting to combine
  45. this security approach with energy
  46. and now here I'm glad to join the
  47. panel on energy security and AI.
  48. >> Perfect. Thank you. It's a pleasure
  49. having you here.
  50. >> Thank you so much. So we already had
  51. interesting insightful presentations. I
  52. would like to go a little bit higher
  53. regarding the level talking about energy
  54. security and AI. And there's this
  55. concept of the Gardner hype cycle. I
  56. don't know if you're aware of that. So
  57. it basically says if there's a new
  58. technology, a new innovation,
  59. it gets a trigger then expectations
  60. increase until the peak of ex
  61. exaggerated expectations. So this is
  62. when much too much is expected from this
  63. new innovation. Then there's the draft
  64. of disillusion
  65. where everyone says well it's never
  66. going to fly. And then there's this path
  67. to enlightenment and finally the plateau
  68. of productivity. So one example would be
  69. blockchain technology which
  70. I think and I didn't hear the word
  71. blockchain at all at this event. I'm
  72. sure four five years ago everyone would
  73. be talking about blockchain.
  74. So this is how things change and using
  75. this concept I would be interested in
  76. what is the status of AI
  77. to ensure energy
  78. security today.
  79. Maybe you can also dive into the
  80. different aspects. Where are we
  81. regarding technology,
  82. regulation,
  83. business models and so on? Are there all
  84. the same level? Are we
  85. behind in some areas? Where do we
  86. need the most progress? And if it's
  87. okay, Jesse, I would start with you.
  88. >> Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. So where are we
  89. with AI today?
  90. I think everybody's trying to find their
  91. way around AI right now and
  92. especially regulation and the
  93. end users are trying to find what is
  94. what is the use case of AI and where is
  95. it kind of most prevalent and I would
  96. say where the data is the most
  97. available and accessible is where AI
  98. lives right now and because data
  99. is like the food of AI. You
  100. either if you have bad data, you will
  101. have bad results and that's
  102. that's my view on the topic.
  103. Perfect. Thank you. Let's continue with
  104. sharing. So regarding the data source,
  105. how far is the Austrian industry
  106. regarding data availability? What are
  107. their expectations on AI, on energy
  108. security? What's important for them?
  109. yeah, AI plays a big role and it's
  110. really important. But before answering
  111. this question, I'd like to give a
  112. broader overview on energy security
  113. and what it actually means for the
  114. Austrian industry because it's not only
  115. anymore about energy supply
  116. only but it's also about about profit
  117. profitability and about prices. So
  118. the paper industry is very energy
  119. intensive. So the prices so
  120. actually the main challenge currently
  121. are the rising prices. so
  122. this is this is a very important
  123. aspect and I think AI can also play here
  124. a role in like predicting what
  125. prices can can can be on the
  126. market. But this is this is also
  127. very very important especially
  128. because there are if you compare I
  129. if you compare the prices in
  130. Europe with the US or with China we
  131. have a lot of challenges here so
  132. yeah there there there's a lot to do
  133. and energy security has also a lot to
  134. do with sustainability and I think
  135. this is also something very important to
  136. highlight. So it's not only
  137. about having energy but also
  138. having having sustainable energy.
  139. So renewables it's really important to
  140. to have more renewables and to
  141. think or to think together to bring
  142. together the energy and the
  143. decorization
  144. goals. Actually there are a lot of
  145. regulative issues on the EU level
  146. targeting decarbonization. So the
  147. industry has to decarbonize and
  148. there the AI comes in and this is
  149. something that the Austrian
  150. as the Austro Papier and also the
  151. industries are very much focusing on.
  152. So we have for example research projects
  153. and providing actually AI tools
  154. to how what are actually the best
  155. solutions for the future combining
  156. the least CO2 emissions with
  157. profitable energy prices. So, so yeah,
  158. this is very important.
  159. >> Perfect. Thank you., during your
  160. presentation, you already showed us
  161. quite some impressive demonstration
  162. projects and innovation projects. Where
  163. do you see the application of AI in
  164. terms of energy security? Where what are
  165. the hurdles, the challenges?
  166. >> Yeah. Yeah, regarding
  167. specifically the grid operators, so DSOs
  168. as well as DSOs, they're traditionally
  169. very very conservative. I'm sure you can
  170. >> attest to that. Yeah, very conservative.
  171. So it's very difficult for TSOs, DSOs
  172. across Europe, not just Austria to
  173. adapt adopt new solutions like AI. I
  174. would say the biggest hurdle would be
  175. the trust issue with AI to ensure
  176. that the outputs that the AI can can
  177. produce is actually believable and it
  178. doesn't cause more issues in the system
  179. rather than solving the issues..
  180. >> So that's really the biggest word I
  181. would say and right now AI is of course
  182. being applied to wide variety of domains
  183. across the energy sector and in fact
  184. right now I'm actually working on a
  185. study for the European Commission DJer.
  186. So they contracted us to find out
  187. what are the best use cases for AI. So
  188. that is currently being worked at. So I
  189. would say it's quite broad but there are
  190. of course some specific use cases
  191. especially generating models. a lot
  192. of LMS have been used for inheriting
  193. or is keeping all this this very
  194. important inherent data that that
  195. very senior technicians for example in
  196. DSOS app and when they leave that whole
  197. information is lost. So that's one
  198. interesting use case where you can use
  199. an LLM to train young technicians to be
  200. able to work in this this very
  201. difficult environment. So it's it's
  202. quite broad I would say and of course
  203. right now it's still in definition
  204. phase. There are pilot projects that are
  205. being that are currently running to
  206. test this, but I would say it's still
  207. very early.
  208. >> Perfect. Thank you, Kobin. Impressive
  209. projects you're working on. Where do you
  210. see the main hurdles in getting to
  211. integrate your products? What are the
  212. perspectives of customers regarding AI?
  213. How do you see this?
  214. So to be honest on your last question so
  215. I guess our customers namely the EV
  216. users they do not have so much
  217. expectations towards AI but the thing is
  218. our selling point lies in fully
  219. optimized electricity right and what
  220. we've done already so going on a very
  221. very deep company level what we've done
  222. already is we were doing a lot
  223. of with machine learning, customer data,
  224. etc. to train our models. We've already
  225. built the first APIs to AI
  226. providers. we did not build LLMs yet
  227. on our own, but this is maybe to come in
  228. in the near future as well. so the
  229. first that's the first thing and where I
  230. see on a second level some usage or some
  231. some good
  232. foundation or some good fundament for
  233. using AI is I showed you these all these
  234. buckets which we are where we are
  235. somehow in between as an aggregator
  236. right we have the energy supply we have
  237. the net operator we have the car
  238. manufacturer we have the wall OX
  239. manufacturer and at some point we need
  240. to ensure interoperabilities
  241. in order to be able to
  242. execute the vehicle to grid topic and I
  243. guess in this context AI will support
  244. this wall to somehow make this
  245. interoperability easier and smoother.
  246. >> Perfect. Thank you so much. So Bar you
  247. already touched the topic of trust into
  248. AI models. So I don't know maybe some of
  249. you remember in 2010 there was this
  250. flash crash at the stock market where
  251. automated
  252. algorithms
  253. sent the market into
  254. into chaos for some minutes wiping
  255. out nearly one trillion in value. So
  256. this is one of the first incidents
  257. where automated
  258. algorithms
  259. did not work out as expected.
  260. So how can we ensure that this does not
  261. happen in the energy sector in our
  262. energy models? What is needed to avoid
  263. this? Is this techn from a technologies
  264. perspective from a regulatory
  265. perspective
  266. and basically can we trust AI or do we
  267. have to fear that it will take over the
  268. energy system the world and we are just
  269. passengers on this trip.
  270. >> Yeah, I already I think indicated
  271. this in my my slides. there's not
  272. going to be some kind of a Skynet event
  273. where we hand over the entire power grid
  274. or the entire energy system to an AI
  275. that controls everything on its own.
  276. that's not going to happen. I think it's
  277. always a co-pilot and so we will take
  278. the help of AI to understand to get some
  279. deep insights into certain aspects but
  280. it's always humanentric. Human always is
  281. in the loop.
  282. So I would like to assure everybody
  283. that's not the direction that we're
  284. taking at all. Yeah. There's not going
  285. to be some kind of fully autonomous
  286. AI controlling all aspects of our
  287. system.
  288. >> Would you like to add to that? Yeah.
  289. >> Yeah. Also, been working with
  290. utilities the past 10 years and seeing
  291. how kind of cautious they are about new
  292. technology into the grid. This is not
  293. going to happen. the
  294. piloting and then kind of digging into
  295. deep into the technology that they're
  296. deploying it will never happen that they
  297. just say okay this is a nice AI just
  298. take over that will never happen.
  299. >> Perfect. Thank you.
  300. Do you want to add something?
  301. >> I fully agree.
  302. >> Fully agree. They will not take the
  303. world over.
  304. >> Perfect.
  305. So, Sheree, from the perspective of an
  306. industrial energy consumer, where do you
  307. see the greatest opportunities,
  308. challenges, risks in ensuring energy
  309. security for
  310. for industrial consumers and for the
  311. papers industry in particular?
  312. >> yeah. thank you for this important
  313. question. And I think it's important to
  314. have this broader picture. So to
  315. combine industrial competitiveness
  316. together with decarbonization and
  317. energy. So I think it's important to
  318. have this broad dimension. and
  319. here AI can play can play a very
  320. important role in showing
  321. what path industry can can actually
  322. take. but also of course there are
  323. a lot of risks to that. so
  324. coming back to energy security we have a
  325. lot of geopolitical risks. and then
  326. we have also linked to that we
  327. have also cyber security risks as well.
  328. And this is of course something that
  329. is also on the on the top on
  330. the agenda on the top of the agenda
  331. of a also the Austrian paper
  332. industries. So when having AI
  333. in any systems it's always about
  334. looking into the into the tools into
  335. the models and it's also it's really
  336. important that the provider of an
  337. software actually tells exactly where
  338. the points are where the security
  339. measures are and yeah and I think
  340. this this is this is really important.
  341. maybe also again I'd like
  342. also again to highlight this
  343. decarbonization issue because there
  344. are a lot of regul regulative
  345. regulatories on EU level and this
  346. is this is something that AI already
  347. plays a role and I think this
  348. this this is also something that will
  349. actually develop more and more in the
  350. into the in the future. So
  351. >> perfect.
  352. >> I hope I answered your question.
  353. >> Perfect. Thank you so much. Kobin, we
  354. already touched upon the topic of data
  355. as food for AI models.
  356. Where do you see the biggest hurdles
  357. in getting data? So, and you're
  358. combining different data sources from
  359. different
  360. companies, organizations.
  361. Which are the ones who already are there
  362. in providing the necessary data? Where
  363. do you see gaps? What what needs to be
  364. done to provide the data in a format
  365. that's usable for your models?
  366. Difficult question.
  367. so right now it's we so two parts right
  368. what we're doing now in the company
  369. in that context we are very very
  370. interdependent on data and customer
  371. behavior of our customers that means we
  372. are dependent on the data of our EV
  373. users this is basically easy to get
  374. because we are generating the data and
  375. we are setting up the data in the way as
  376. we want it to be set up, right?
  377. once you think one step ahead of that
  378. and coming back to vehicle to grid topic
  379. I guess it is so we have the
  380. experts here. So if we will build the
  381. intersection to grid operators and to
  382. the energy market I get I guess this
  383. data is not so difficult to get either
  384. right it depends so it's how you how
  385. it's organized within the local
  386. >> yeah it depends really because right
  387. now at least in Austria so data
  388. protection is very very strong and to
  389. get the customer data I don't know the
  390. smart meter data or any other data
  391. related to consumption production This
  392. is very difficult. Yeah. So we have the
  393. the law local energy community that
  394. could be one option to get this. But
  395. again like you mentioned electric
  396. vehicle is not defined under this law.
  397. So perhaps there's a some kind of a link
  398. there so that you are part of a
  399. community but this this electric vehicle
  400. V2G is kind of an add-on but that's not
  401. defined on the mall right now.
  402. and that's the
  403. additional thing I guess the most
  404. complicated part in terms of getting
  405. data and in terms of somehow ensuring
  406. interoperabilities
  407. in that context is the EV
  408. manufacturer
  409. because I guess these kind of
  410. stakeholders need some regulatory
  411. pressure to somehow release data to
  412. somehow participate and this is not
  413. defined at this point of
  414. But we are full of hope because I
  415. was reading through the program of our
  416. new government and it was a very very
  417. strong and bold bullet point that
  418. they integrating everything which is
  419. required for vehicle to grid in the
  420. future laws namely EV for example.
  421. >> Yeah this is true I can attest to that.
  422. Yeah, it is right now sitting on the
  423. desk of a colleague of mine for public
  424. inputs right now at this stage and
  425. and yeah, I think the again this is
  426. not fully clear but battery is defined
  427. or is going to be defined and if battery
  428. is defined then it's not a it's not far
  429. away to define electric vehicle which is
  430. which is a battery which moves.
  431. >> Yeah.
  432. >> Yeah. The LVG is a law that is also
  433. important for the for the Austrian paper
  434. industry because it will also like
  435. enable more flexibility of energy
  436. of use of energy and this is
  437. really important. however it's not
  438. yeah there are still some challenges
  439. also coming with this with this
  440. law but yeah and batteries are included.
  441. So of course batteries are also aspect
  442. very important aspect also for the for
  443. the industry.
  444. >> Perfect. Thank you for that.
  445. >> Jesse, what would you add regarding data
  446. availability, data formats,
  447. standardization of data input, people
  448. willing to provide the necessary data
  449. and so on.
  450. >> Yeah, people probably are
  451. available and willing to give the
  452. data, but the utilities for example are
  453. are not. they don't like their data
  454. to be outside of their fence. So to
  455. be able to deploy AI and what we have
  456. learned is that we need to deploy the AI
  457. inside of the fence and bring onpremise
  458. solutions for the utilities so they are
  459. easily implemented there. They don't
  460. have to go through regulatory hurdles of
  461. of sending data outside of their fences
  462. and things like that. So that's
  463. that's then derisking the innovation
  464. for the utilities for example.
  465. >> Perfect. Shireen
  466. could you add from a consu industrial
  467. consumer perspective any insight in
  468. the willingness to share data to give
  469. data outside? Would you rather prefer to
  470. have as Jesse said the models running
  471. inside
  472. the companies?
  473. yeah I companies I agree with you
  474. companies don't don't really like
  475. sharing data of course we
  476. had for example a big research project
  477. on how to decarbonize and which
  478. which also which solutions for the
  479. paper industry are viable for the
  480. future with also scenarios and things
  481. like that. and yeah it was it was
  482. a research project that was
  483. financed by some of the companies and
  484. and there were some discussions on
  485. will they like provide it for
  486. everyone or not and of course it's
  487. something when it comes to data it's
  488. it's always yeah it's always hard
  489. actually.
  490. Yeah, but regulators can Yeah, but the
  491. regulators can force utilities and DSOs
  492. to provide this data. Especially in
  493. Austria where EG
  494. local law is forcing DSOS to provide
  495. this data to all the customers.
  496. So it has to be done through the
  497. regulation way
  498. >> regulator
  499. this is something where I have to say
  500. that's that's of course not not
  501. interesting because everything that you
  502. know comes by forcing It's more
  503. problematic I would say. So
  504. >> I think you need both.
  505. >> Let me let me let me try let me try to
  506. rephrase that bit. So I didn't use the
  507. right terminology. So I should have said
  508. the customers are willing willing to
  509. participate in the energy community and
  510. to enable this they need to they need
  511. their data and the DSOs are owning this
  512. data and that's the reason they need to
  513. provide this data. So it's for the
  514. benefit of the customer. So let me
  515. rephrase that again. It's it's a bit of
  516. a difference here because DSOs are
  517. are fiduciary public entities of course
  518. privately owned but they're for the
  519. public but industries of course
  520. industries are slightly different. Yeah.
  521. So it has
  522. >> your own yeah industrial or business
  523. goals that they have and I can
  524. completely understand that.
  525. >> Yeah. And of course it's also about the
  526. competition. yeah you cannot
  527. share everything with other companies
  528. but since you are you are
  529. focusing more on energy communities
  530. because this is also something that is
  531. being discussed currently but very
  532. theoretically how in future
  533. baby industry can like have a own energy
  534. community to share energy within
  535. within the certain industry baby
  536. industries but this is very
  537. theoretically the advantage would be
  538. the network costs that might be not
  539. there anymore and then the prices would
  540. be better. But yeah right now there
  541. is no like legislative like like a
  542. law actually that is making that
  543. possible. But who is the
  544. producer in that scenario? Because it
  545. basically should balance out producers
  546. and consumers and paper industry is
  547. strongly consuming. Right.
  548. >> Exactly. It's very strongly consuming
  549. but it's also many companies also
  550. produce electricity. and so yeah it's
  551. it's they are also producing and
  552. there biogas for example is very
  553. important within the within the paper
  554. industry yeah
  555. >> but I think it's currently but within
  556. the current regulations of local
  557. contributors it is possible for
  558. industries to join the communities
  559. this is actually currently possible. But
  560. again, of course, it's not fully open.
  561. There are some restrictions on that. So,
  562. it's not the same as some individual
  563. household customers join, but industries
  564. and companies can join right now.
  565. Yeah. With some restrictions, of course.
  566. >> Perfect. Thank you. Unfortunately, we
  567. are somehow running out of time. So, I
  568. would like to go through one last round.
  569. And we started the panel discussing
  570. about the status quo. I would like now
  571. like to move towards the future. So what
  572. are your expectations for 10 minutes?
  573. yeah, but it's an important topic for
  574. what's going to happen in the future and
  575. what are the most exciting developments
  576. or breakthroughs you foresee in the
  577. integration of AI and for energy
  578. security
  579. and how do we ensure that AI does not
  580. only improve system efficiency but
  581. creates a more sustainable, resilient
  582. and equitable energy future.
  583. Who wants to start? Any volunteer or do
  584. I have to pick one?
  585. So in the future for AI, the
  586. the big hurdle will or or the big jump
  587. will come once quantum computing
  588. comes in and enables a lot more
  589. computing power that we have right now.
  590. Then the AI models are on steroids
  591. basically. and that's kind of a
  592. scary place also because then like no
  593. password and nothing is safe anymore in
  594. the in the internet or the grid or
  595. anywhere. So there's definitely needed
  596. some good regulation to kind of mitigate
  597. the risks but I think the upside is
  598. also quite exciting of infinite
  599. possibilities of utilizing data for
  600. for different AI models.
  601. >> So summarizing you would say the
  602. bottleneck currently for the AI models
  603. is computing power.
  604. >> No no not right now. it will
  605. just enable a next jump. right now
  606. the data and availability of the data
  607. is probably the bigger bigger hurdle and
  608. and
  609. yeah and also like we have mentioned
  610. trust of the AI. AI is something new.
  611. It's it's it's like the new big
  612. efficiency engine that just came about
  613. and people are not really trusting
  614. it that oh can it really deliver all
  615. these good things and u yeah that
  616. that will be kind of the bigger hurdle
  617. there but yeah
  618. >> and what could we do to increase this
  619. trust in into AI?
  620. explanability goes a long way
  621. I think and kind of showcasing
  622. what data is used and how. and
  623. yeah I think if if your buddy
  624. tells about an awesome fishing trip and
  625. and tells you that I got caught a
  626. two 2 m fish you won't believe him. But
  627. if he shows a picture then you believe
  628. him right. So it's about the
  629. explanability of a story and where
  630. wherever AI is implemented.
  631. >> Perfect. Thank you. So Shireen from your
  632. side do you see that it's already well
  633. explained how AI works the industry?
  634. What are the expectations of the
  635. industry for the future using AI?
  636. of course it is a AI is considered as
  637. the most important thing that will
  638. have a very will play a very
  639. big role and already now AI is more
  640. and more used. So not only in the energy
  641. sector but also in other you
  642. know when when producing paper
  643. for example here AI already plays a
  644. big role. So definitely and there
  645. are a lot of discussions and debates
  646. on that. we are also part of the of
  647. TP which is the confederation of the
  648. European paper industries and there
  649. always sections and sections and
  650. panels and meetings on AI in the
  651. paper industry related also to energy
  652. very much to decarbonization. So I
  653. would say it is consider considered
  654. as the solution for many things.
  655. but yeah still we have some
  656. regulation regulative issues to
  657. think about and there are many risks of
  658. course cyber security as I have
  659. mentioned but I would I
  660. wouldn't say that there is no trust
  661. actually maybe maybe the trust maybe
  662. there is not no not trust to everyone
  663. let's say you have other other
  664. experiences of course but I think I
  665. think there is a trust in AI as a
  666. whole.
  667. >> Yeah. I see a lot of exciting
  668. things. I'm I'm hopeful. I want to be
  669. hopeful. I want to be open-minded. I
  670. want to be early adopter of the
  671. solutions that are being developed
  672. at the moment. Yeah, of course, trust.
  673. Trust and explanability is kind of
  674. very important. but I would say that
  675. there's a lot of research that is being
  676. done on this exact issue across the
  677. world. So of course not specific to
  678. energy industry but AI in general. So
  679. explanability is kind of the most
  680. important criteria right now across the
  681. world for adoption. and yeah in
  682. the study that I mentioned earlier for
  683. the European Commission we are
  684. trying to also be very hopeful in this
  685. study and try to recommend that AI needs
  686. to be integrated into a lot of different
  687. workflows from planning of energy system
  688. to operation of energy system and to
  689. ultimately commissioning of energy
  690. system. all of these things, the whole
  691. spectrum. we want to see more and
  692. more AI applications in the whole
  693. ecosystem of energy and I think there
  694. are some some severe bottlenecks right
  695. now in energy transition. For example,
  696. grid connection and certification
  697. bottleneck right now. So I think 15
  698. terowatts of power is just sitting in
  699. the queue right now in across Europe
  700. because there are not enough electrical
  701. engineers to certify plants to be
  702. connected so they can start selling
  703. power to the to the TSO or to the DSO
  704. and these kind of issues can be
  705. eliminated or at least reduced with the
  706. help of AI. I think it's a very powerful
  707. tool. We should be of course cautious
  708. about use of AI but we need to be also
  709. optimistic and hopeful that it's going
  710. to deliver some very unique as well as
  711. solutions that are not typically
  712. out there in the in the system
  713. realm.
  714. >> Perfect. Thank you. So Copinian,
  715. how do you see the future for vehicles
  716. to grid? What are currently the hurdles?
  717. How does the a perfect world in a few
  718. decades look like from from your
  719. perspective?
  720. >> So I spoke so much about grit. Now I
  721. would like to add one holistic thing and
  722. and connecting what you have said. I
  723. guess the whole energy system as we
  724. know it today is highly interdependent,
  725. right? We have PV systems, they're
  726. somehow connected to batteries, to cars
  727. in the very near future. We have the
  728. grid operators, we have the energy
  729. suppliers, and they're all somehow
  730. swinging and talking with each other.
  731. And this is super complex obviously. And
  732. I guess AI could be the trigger point or
  733. the mean to make this somehow smoothly
  734. going. This is I guess the big chance of
  735. AI and this is a very holistic view. I
  736. I'm afraid a very future fear because
  737. right now as said we do not even have a
  738. clear regulatory understanding whether
  739. we are allowed to push energy from an
  740. out from a car battery back into the
  741. grid or not. So these are highly
  742. regulatory aspects and I do believe as
  743. well that at some point you need some
  744. you need to have some regulatory
  745. pressure and some regulatory
  746. forcement or however you would like to
  747. call this at least you need very
  748. dedicated laws to that and I think this
  749. is the big bottleneck right now.
  750. >> Perfect. And do you think regulators are
  751. on track setting up all these
  752. regulations or
  753. >> I believe so. I strongly believe so. But
  754. you must imagine what happened in
  755. the last 10 years. Our perception, our
  756. understanding of what is the primary
  757. energy source on this earth has totally
  758. changed. Right? 10 years ago we would
  759. have said there are some fossil things.
  760. Right? Right now we say it's electricity
  761. and end of story. And to adjust all our
  762. laws to that is difficult and takes some
  763. time.
  764. >> Perfect. Thank you so much. I believe
  765. this was quite an engaging and
  766. insightful discussion. So thank you for
  767. that. It made my life much easier that
  768. you were so proactive contributing.
  769. So I would like to summarize that when
  770. we thoughtfully apply AI, we can enhance
  771. our forecasting efficiency and
  772. responsiveness in our energy systems.
  773. And while it might introduce new
  774. complexities and vulnerabilities, I
  775. believe we're pretty good on track on
  776. making the future energy system much
  777. more resilient, much more efficient, and
  778. and basically a better system for the
  779. future. So thank you for that and with
  780. this I would
  781. >> last keynote.
  782. >> Last keynote
  783. >> enough to summarize.
  784. >> Sure. Do you want to add something on
  785. that?
  786. >> Do you have any questions?
  787. >> Yeah. Let's go for the audience for some
  788. questions.
  789. >> Question.
  790. >> Everyone is waiting for the drinks.
  791. >> Yeah.
  792. >> Okay. So a big applause for the last
  793. Thank you. Thank